Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Adobe engineer doubts Obama birth certificate
WND ^ | June 23, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 06/23/2011 6:09:10 PM PDT by RobinMasters

Gary Poyssick, an early employee of software giant Adobe System Inc., continues to maintain there is something "fishy" about the Obama long-form birth certificate released by the White House.

"What the White House released is not a simple scan," Poyssick told WND. "Something digital came between the paper and the glass."

Poyssick was at the San Jose-based tech company when it counted no more than 14 employees, and he continues to advise and write on Adobe software products

Poyssick, who today devotes his energies to running The Online Fisherman in Tampa, Fla., has written more than 50 titles about Adobe software, the printing industry, coding and programming, website development and workflow management.

His initial reaction was to declare the birth certificate an outright forgery.

"I could have done a much better replica myself, if the president had asked," Poyssick told The Political Sandbox blog when the birth certificate first appeared and he opened the document in Adobe Illustrator. "The guy that did this is a bimbo in that he forgot to 'flatten' his works to soften the background edges so the fake letters blended, softly into the green paper.

Observing that the birth certificate document had multiple layers when opened in Adobe Illustrator, Poyssick was amazed the White House had released an electronic PDF file that had not been "flattened" so as to remove all evidence that it had been modified.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; eligibility; fraud; naturalborncitizen; obama; palin; plain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: RobinMasters

In other news, 8559 Adobe employees say Obama’s Birth Certificate is a forgery.


21 posted on 06/23/2011 8:04:15 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

So dweeb in teh White Hut basement is collecting all the expert advice and will soon produce the document to be filed in AbercrumbieGumby’s archives in Hawaii. Before the 2012 voting date, barry the bassturd will have it re;eased to the world at large. Of course the little dweeb will already be worm food ... can’t have any witnesses who might have a change of hope, er I mean change of heart. Governor Gumby better have a really good cardiologist on 24/7 call.


22 posted on 06/23/2011 8:15:03 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NurdlyPeon; RaceBannon
“Obama is flipping us the bird just to show us that he can do it.”

That is EXACTILY what they are doing.

23 posted on 06/23/2011 8:15:24 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

The race label of AFRICAN to designate who he was is not a valid label in 1960s nor since. Therefore the document did not comply with existing criteria.


24 posted on 06/23/2011 8:20:14 PM PDT by spookie (SPOOKIE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Since I’m all for equal rights I ask how do we know it’s a guy who’s the bimbo here?


25 posted on 06/23/2011 8:32:16 PM PDT by printhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

I suspect that Donald Trump played a willing part in abetting this. Immediately after this forgery was released Obama went on TV and declared the case was closed, the issue had been addressed.


26 posted on 06/23/2011 9:05:02 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (I retain the right to be inconsistent, contradictory and even flat-out wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

I am a converted anti-birther. I look at the evidence. I am convinced that Obama was double-crossed. This is an OBVIOUS forgery.


27 posted on 06/23/2011 11:05:00 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Placemark.

Will email you tomorrow.


28 posted on 06/23/2011 11:09:17 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

A nest of libs is unavoidable. I think Obama was outed. And probably the person who set him up is wondering wtf? How can this pig fly for so long?


29 posted on 06/23/2011 11:10:19 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Observing that the birth certificate document had multiple layers when opened in Adobe Illustrator, Poyssick was amazed the White House had released an electronic PDF file that had not been "flattened" so as to remove all evidence that it had been modified.

We all were.
30 posted on 06/23/2011 11:10:57 PM PDT by PA Engineer (SP/AW12: Time to beat the swords of government tyranny into the plowshares of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
What we are reading is from a person who is a part of a famous highly respected software firm.

He didn't just work for Adobe--He helped to develop the very software that was likely used to create this fake document.

31 posted on 06/24/2011 4:24:14 AM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Some thoughts on Obama's long form birth certificate:

1. OBAMA'S MOTHER'S SIGNATURE: Myself, I have a hard time believing---after looking at several of Obama's mother's signatures on the internet---that Obama's mother's signed her name by putting her first name "Stanley" in the bizarre looking parenthesis.

2. ONAKA SMILEY FACE: I have trouble understanding how there is an obvious "face" in the "O" of "Onaka", while on other Hawaii birth certificates on the internet, the "face" is missing from the "O" in "Onaka."

3. OBAMA AND KAPIOLANI HOSPITAL OFFICIALS: Of course, President Obama and Kapiolani Hospital officials would go a long way to prove that Obama's long form is authentic if only President Obama would allow Kapiolani officials to let reporters examine Obama's Aug. 4, 1961---Obama's claimed birth date---hospital records today, but don't hold your breath.

4. April 27, 2011 to June 24, 2011: It has been just about 2 MONTHS and counting since Obama released his long form birth certificate to great fanfare at a White House press conference, but still Obama has not given Kapiolani Hospital officials permission to allow reporters to examine Obama's Aug. 4, 1961 records. Why is that?

5. As I understand it, Kapiolani records would contain the same routine information that we already see on Obama's long form birth certificate, so why won't Obama give Kapiolani permission to allow reporters to look at Obama's records? We want to examine Kapiolani's records in order to have a second party verify that Obama was indeed born at Kapiolani as is stated on Obama's long form birth certificate.

6. So if Obama had no problem in contacting Hawaii officials and obtaining his long form birth certificate, then why in the world is Obama playing hardball when it comes to allowing Kapiolani to let reporters examine his Aug. 4, 1961 records?

7. Is the answer a simple one: There are no Kapiolani records to release, because Obama was not born there on Aug. 4, 1961 as is stated on the long form birth certificate.

8. In my opinion, the longer Obama and Kapiolani hospital officials play hardball and don't release Obama's records, the more VOTES Obaam will lose on election day Nov. 2012.

9. NOTE: If Obama is planning to spring a deadly trap on birther nation by waiting for just the right moment to allow Kapiolani officials to release his Aug. 4, 1961 records, he better not wait too long, because a lot of VOTERS may become so angry with Obama for waiting so long that they will take out their anger in the VOTING booth on election day Nov. 2012 by voting AGAINST Obama.

32 posted on 06/24/2011 9:59:58 AM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
It's not really a "doubt". The odds of the stuff occurring naturally that are there at a pixel level are astronomical. It's an obvious fake. When I first saw it my reaction was almost more about the EXTREME incompetence of such a phoned-in attempt to fake a document so many people care so much about, than it was about what it meant about the document itself. Doesn't prove there isn't a real document except if there is one, wouldn't just producing it be a lot easier for The Won? So it seems we're left with only two alternative plausible explanations for the obvious fake. Either there IS no original, or the original contains something he doesn't want us to see.
33 posted on 06/24/2011 11:21:43 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Bump


34 posted on 06/24/2011 12:30:55 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson