To: Berlin_Freeper
2 posted on
06/18/2011 1:58:14 PM PDT by
Psalm 144
(Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Bring our boys and aircraft home!!!
3 posted on
06/18/2011 1:58:21 PM PDT by
Paperdoll
(NO MORE BUSHS!)
To: Berlin_Freeper
And to think that these guys were actually going to have to fight the Russians if WW3 broke out.
4 posted on
06/18/2011 1:59:17 PM PDT by
Farmer Dean
(stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Good start,that is how you kill a billion of them,a few at a time.
5 posted on
06/18/2011 2:00:11 PM PDT by
Cheetahcat
( November 4 2008 ,A date that will live in Infamy.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
To: Berlin_Freeper
They could not possibly have injured anyone since we are not engaged in “hostilities”.
7 posted on
06/18/2011 2:01:48 PM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: Berlin_Freeper
8 posted on
06/18/2011 2:02:03 PM PDT by
John W
(Natural-born US citizen since 1955)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Which will happen on occaision when ‘friendly’ ground forces are not accompanied by a forward air controller. Sometimes it even happens when the ARE with a FAC. I’m guessing NATO pilots only have a vague idea as to exactly where the so-called frontlines are, making close air support next to impossible.
9 posted on
06/18/2011 2:02:35 PM PDT by
Tallguy
(You can safely ignore anything that precedes the word "But"...)
To: Berlin_Freeper
10 posted on
06/18/2011 2:04:09 PM PDT by
xjcsa
(Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Comedy of errors with real lives.
How come the left isn’t screaming about these innocents dying?
11 posted on
06/18/2011 2:05:09 PM PDT by
Vendome
("Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it anyway")
To: Berlin_Freeper
Well works for me.
Didn´t Nato say they want to protect civillians?
And a rebel with a gun is no civillian.
But of course since we play air force for the rebels (because this is what we do) i guess Nato regrets it.
To: Berlin_Freeper
NATO admits mistakenly striking Libyan opposition forces Oh well, kind of like Bosnia/Serbia. Yawnnnnn.
18 posted on
06/18/2011 3:14:27 PM PDT by
FreeMaine
(America unite and kick Maine out of the Union.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
19 posted on
06/18/2011 3:25:28 PM PDT by
Iron Munro
(Know your enemy and know yourself and you can fight a hundred battles without disaster - Sun Tzu)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Well, I’m sure the bombing was done without any hostility.
20 posted on
06/18/2011 3:29:17 PM PDT by
wildbill
(You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
So NATO admits that their Islamic terrorist friends were threatening civilians? Time for them to start spinning - or bombing more hospitals.
23 posted on
06/18/2011 4:14:46 PM PDT by
PAR35
To: Berlin_Freeper
Here's an interesting map that a supporter of the rebels updates every few days. I wouldn't rely on its complete accuracy but there aren't very many sources for info as to what's happening on the ground. Take it for what it's worth.
25 posted on
06/18/2011 7:41:48 PM PDT by
Pan_Yan
To: Berlin_Freeper
What, they had “bad maps” again like they did when they bombed the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade?
26 posted on
06/18/2011 7:45:05 PM PDT by
dfwgator
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson