Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Environmental groups sue over Shell offshore plan
chron.com ^ | 9 June 2011 | JENNIFER A. DLOUHY

Posted on 06/10/2011 10:38:19 PM PDT by smokingfrog

WASHINGTON -- Lawsuits filed Thursday that challenge the federal government's approval of a Shell Oil Co. offshore exploration plan present a major test of regulators' power to swiftly review deep-water drilling blueprints.

In two separate but overlapping filings, conservationists argue the government was bound by federal law to first finish a post-spill environmental study of the Gulf of Mexico before approving Shell's plan last month.

The legal complaints were filed in the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit Court of Appeals — one by the Defenders of Wildlife, Center for Biological Diversity and the Natural Resources Defense Council and the other by Earthjustice, the Gulf Restoration Network, the Florida Wildlife Federation and the Sierra Club.

The Defenders of Wildlife coalition alleges that by approving Shell's exploration plan, the government violated the National Environmental Policy Act and several other federal laws that generally require environmental studies and coordination with other agencies before actions they take that could hurt marine life or affect the environment. Earthjustice's more limited challenge focuses on the environmental policy law.

The litigation carries high stakes for the government and the oil and gas industry. A ruling against the Interior Department's Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement could deal a crippling blow to the agency and thwart chances of companies quickly launching new deep-water drilling projects in the Gulf. By contrast, a decision in the agency's favor would bolster its chances of swiftly reviewing offshore drilling plans in the future.

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: 11thcircus; boemre; corruption; debt; default; democratcorruption; drillheredrillnow; earthjustice; economy; envirofascism; envirowackos; fraud; fundedbysoros; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; gulfofmexico; liberalfascism; liberals; nrdc; obama; progressives; shtf; sierraclub; soros; teotwawki
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 06/10/2011 10:38:22 PM PDT by smokingfrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

How much offshore oil money do these groups get?


2 posted on 06/10/2011 10:45:09 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

AH!... but WHO funds the environmental group in question?..
Soros or some other left wing enabler?..
Usually its not about the environment..
ITS ABOUT POLITICS...


3 posted on 06/10/2011 10:45:52 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Before groups like Defenders of Wildlife, Center for Biological Diversity, Natural Resources Defense Council, Earthjustice, Gulf Restoration Network, Florida Wildlife Federation, and Sierra Club are allowed to object to an oil project, they should be required to show when they have ever favored any oil project anywhere.

The fact is that they oppose any project that is not an OPEC project. They will produce reams of paper detailing their objections to whatever project you’ve got in mind but the short version is simply this: its not OPEC, and they aren’t for it. OPEC projects are good for the earth. Non-OPEC projects have to be smothered in the crib where ever you find them.


4 posted on 06/10/2011 10:47:51 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Granted, once Palin is elected she’ll have plenty to do, but I hope she makes it impossible for these communist front groups to have any standing whatsoever. I’d prefer they were outlawed entirely, but I’ll take what I can get.

If we get all 3 back, Legislate that domestic/offshore drilling/mining for natural resources is a matter of national security and attempts to stop it are treasonous.

Enough of this crap.


5 posted on 06/10/2011 10:47:51 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
The 0bama-Democrat-RINO (Progressive) "No Domestic Energy Policy!"

It Begins… First Oil Rig Relocates From Gulf to Foreign Waters

"As a result of the uncertainties surrounding the offshore drilling moratorium, we are actively seeking international opportunities to keep our rigs fully employed," Dickerson said. "We greatly regret the loss of U.S. jobs that will result from this rig relocation."

Idled Gulf Rigs Head For Africa

It is not just Gulf operations that are being effected either.

Wait and see for Shell {Shell puts Arctic drilling plans on hold, waiting on feds}

Let's not leave the refineries out.

EPA gives final "no" to Texas refinery permits

Then there are the land-based oil leases.

Judge Grills Feds on Pulling Drilling Leases

"A federal judge on Wednesday questioned Interior Secretary Ken Salazar's justification for canceling 77 drilling leases sold by the Bush administration around national parks in Utah."

U.S. Saw Drill Ban Killing Many Jobs [ie. Obama KNEW he was destroying jobs, kept it secret]

Obama and O'Malley are Hurting the Poor in Md by Shutting Down Nuclear Power

Obama Administration Blocking 103 Gulf Drilling Permits February 03, 2011

Obama Clears the Way For America's 2 Largest Oil Wells to be Shutdown in Texas April 25th, 2011 (to "save" an "endangered" lizard)

EPA threatens Utah with air quality sanctions

Energy in America: EPA Rules Force Shell to Abandon Oil Drilling Plans

6 posted on 06/10/2011 10:52:27 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

How come THEY are never found to be ‘WITHOUT STANDING’?.........


7 posted on 06/10/2011 10:53:05 PM PDT by Red Badger (Nothing is a 'right' if someone has to give it to you................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
Legislate that domestic/offshore drilling/mining for natural resources is a matter of national security...

Indeed. Because it is.

8 posted on 06/10/2011 10:53:19 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Congress could fix this Monday morning by repealing the “National Environmental Policy Act and several other federal laws that generally require environmental studies and coordination with other agencies before actions they take that could hurt marine life or affect the environment.”


9 posted on 06/11/2011 12:09:44 AM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
Environmental groups sue over Shell offshore plan

Do environmental groups ever do anything besides sue?

10 posted on 06/11/2011 12:28:42 AM PDT by kittycatonline.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

these assholes, AND the EPA need to be shut down, they are not concerned about the environment, they are enemies of American progress.


11 posted on 06/11/2011 2:33:22 AM PDT by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now, and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
Sounds like Soros. Wonder who is funding these groups
12 posted on 06/11/2011 3:01:23 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Will they sue to protest BHO-Brazil offshore deal?


13 posted on 06/11/2011 4:25:54 AM PDT by PORD (People Of Right & Duty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“How come THEY are never found to be ‘WITHOUT STANDING’?.........”

It would then stand to reason that a well funded group of Americans who are pro-drilling should be formed to sue the environmental groups for harming America.

There are numerous cases where “unintended consequence” have done more damage then good. They need to be held accountable for their actions.


14 posted on 06/11/2011 4:48:49 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Sarah Palin - SheÂ’s living rent-free inside the MSMÂ’s heads. Credited to Lurk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA

While a great idea (and one that should happen as well), It would still leave econazis an easy hurdle. They would still have near-unfettered access to move their crap through the courts.

By officially codifying all energy and resource matters as a National Security issue (eliminate the DOE/EPA/BLM) and sticking it under the NSA, that makes it one hell of a hurdle and really insurmountable. Since all drilling and mining would be a security issue, the ecos would be barred from accessing both the sites themselves and all the paperwork involved.

They cannot get classified docs turned over.

As for the companies/employees, give them special government clearances. Then they can’t be sued personally as they are acting as agents of the government on official business.

Now I’m sure someone will come along and call me a Communist, but this isn’t federalizing and I don’t really give a damn. Something ‘extreme’ needs to be done to stop this insanity. The companies are still private entities acting on Govt authority. Think security agencies in Iraq/Afghan.

As someone replied earlier, this IS a NatSec issue and why in the name of God is our national security beholden to a bunch of agenda driven liberal/communists? There is no justification for ANY lawsuit to go forward. And since the judiciary cannot be relied on to protect the public interest when fish and flies are involved, We’ll have to get it done like they did in the old days. Ram it down their throats.


15 posted on 06/11/2011 5:05:39 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Can a dead lawyer still litigate


16 posted on 06/11/2011 5:07:06 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

OPEC


17 posted on 06/11/2011 5:13:55 AM PDT by Rumplemeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Anybody else looking forward to the day reality doesn’t tolerate groups like this?


18 posted on 06/11/2011 7:56:14 AM PDT by RWB Patriot ("My ability is a value that must be purchased and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
"AH!... but WHO funds the environmental group in question?..
Soros or some other left wing enabler?..
"

Most of you couldn't stand the truth, but here it is. I've seen it up close in more than one locale. Wealthier members of HOAs (homeowners' associations, NIMBYs), local real estate and service business interests most often start the fake environmentalist efforts against new energy exploration and harvesting. They don't want to see any kind of energy rig near their developments.

They are mostly retirees/investors/corporates with histories in everything from law to business or government administration. Their political influences are multi-partisan.


19 posted on 06/11/2011 2:56:38 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in a thunderous avalanche of rottenness heard across the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWB Patriot
"Anybody else looking forward to the day reality doesn’t tolerate groups like this?"

Yes. Further monetization of the debt followed by default is the only way. They'll be deposed by that and that only (their own activities). And they won't be able to continue their big government influences with a worthless currency and without a large manufacturing base. Prepare yourselves, and you've won. Given you're ready to get into leadership positions in local politics, when the fat bureaucrat, finally unemployed and without pension checks, sings her final lamentations.
20 posted on 06/11/2011 3:00:54 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in a thunderous avalanche of rottenness heard across the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson