Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada Pipeline Is Critical to U.S. Energy Security, Oil Industry Says
CNSNews ^ | June 10, 2011 | Penny Starr

Posted on 06/10/2011 12:04:15 PM PDT by jazusamo

(CNSNews.com) – Wanted: More domestic energy production and crude oil from Canada.

That’s the gist of a new ad campaign sponsored by the American Petroleum Institute, a group that represents more than 470 oil and natural gas companies.

Jack Gerard, president and CEO of the American Petroleum Institute, says if the U.S. develops its own oil and natural gas resources and imports more oil from Canada, the country could meet 92 percent of its liquid fuels needs by 2030, compared with 62 percent today.

“Let me repeat that once again for emphasis,” Gerard told reporters during a conference call on Wednesday. “The analysis we’re releasing today will be part of our rollout, and the (ad) campaign shows that the U.S. could meet 92 percent of our liquid fuel demand by 2030.”

To boost domestic oil production, the U.S. must do more drilling in areas that are now off-limits, including large parts of the Gulf of Mexico, Gerard said.

And Gerard said that to boost imports from Canada, the third phase of the Keystone XL Pipeline Expansion project must be put on a fast track.

The Keystone XL Pipeline would consist of approximately 1,711 miles of new, 36-inch-diameter pipeline, covering 327 miles in Canada and 1,384 miles in the U.S. If it’s completed, it would bring crude oil from Hardisty, Alberta to the Texas Gulf Coast.

Because this proposed project will cross into the United States from Canada, State Department approval is required for the project to proceed. The State Department has until the end of the year to make a decision on the Keystone XL Pipeline.

Earlier this week, the Environmental Protection Agency sent a letter to the State Department, raising a number of concerns regarding the potential environmental impact of the proposed project.

Those concerns include potential oil spills, higher greenhouse emission levels at Gulf Coast refineries. The EPA also raised “environmental justice concerns” about low-income and minority communities that could be affected by proximity to the pipeline.

API, however, says the pipeline extension will not only boost energy security but also will create thousands of American jobs.

"U.S. jobs supported by Canadian oil sands development could grow from 21,000 jobs today to 465,000 jobs by 2035," API Executive Vice President Marty Durbin said in May in support of the pipeline expansion. "The Keystone XL pipeline has undergone extensive analysis and review over the last two years, and it is time to focus efforts on creating jobs and strengthening our relationship with America’s number-one source of imported oil -- Canada."

Gerard said energy security and creating jobs are critical to improving the U.S. economy.

“With the unemployment rate at 9.1 percent and our government running annual deficits well above $1 trillion, effective action on the economy has rarely been needed more,” Gerard said. “Our industry can help by doing what we do best – develop oil, natural gas and other forms of energy.”

Gerard said the API’s ad campaign “will help policymakers and the public understand that the oil and natural gas industry is a major constructive force in rebuilding our economy and that it stands ready to do far more.”

API will run ads for the campaign “inside the Beltway” in the Washington area and in nine states – Arkansas, Florida, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, Virginia, West Virginia and Wisconsin.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: api; epa; keystone; pipeline
Drill Here, Drill Now!
1 posted on 06/10/2011 12:04:21 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Radical liberal interests have worked hard against the Alberta oil sands production and transportation.


2 posted on 06/10/2011 12:09:56 PM PDT by familyop (Shut up, and eat your brains!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

EPA will drive us into a depression if they are allowed to continue. If they haven’t already.


3 posted on 06/10/2011 12:14:43 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA; familyop

Yes, the EPA very well may.

Between Obama, his EPA, the enviro-nazis and the State Dept it’ll be a feat for this to get approval but we sure need it.


4 posted on 06/10/2011 12:23:35 PM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Energy security?

Energy security???

At this point, are we still pretending Obama’s interested in security for anyone but himself?


5 posted on 06/10/2011 1:17:46 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; DManA

Arnold Schwarzenegger and the State of California were working against it with environmentalist excuses years ago in partnership with eastern Canadian interests (Ontario service “industry,” northeastern US importers, all).


6 posted on 06/10/2011 1:59:37 PM PDT by familyop (Shut up, and eat your brains!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson