Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sugar Farmers Sue Corn Processors for Falsely Marketing High-Fructose Corn Syrup
Imperial Sugar Company | Apr 29, 2011 | Imperial Sugar Company

Posted on 05/22/2011 1:27:43 PM PDT by DannyTN

American sugar farmers and refiners have filed a suit to stop big corn processors from marketing high-fructose corn syrup as a “natural” product equivalent to real sugar.

The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles by Western Sugar Cooperative, Michigan Sugar Company and C & H Sugar Company, Inc., charges that the “corn sugar” branding campaign financed by the corn refining industry’s giant companies constitutes false advertising under federal and state law. The processors’ campaign was launched as a way to thwart declining sales of high-fructose corn syrup, or “HFCS.”

Companies named as defendants include Archer Daniels Midland Company, Cargill, Inc., Corn Products International, Inc., Penford Products Co., Roquette America, Inc., Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc. and the companies’ marketing and lobbying organization, The Corn Refiners Association, Inc.

“This suit is about false advertising, pure and simple,” said Inder Mathur, President and CEO of Western Sugar Cooperative. “If consumers are concerned about your product, then you should improve it or explain its benefits, not try to deceive people about its name or distort scientific facts.”

The sugar producers seek an injunction to end the advertising campaign and also seek damages, including compensation for corrective advertising.

According to the complaint, consumers have increasingly sought to avoid food and drinks containing HFCS, because of its possible role in the obesity epidemic and other nutritional and health problems, or simply to avoid non-natural ingredients. As a result, food and beverage makers have been replacing HFCS with real sugar, and the corn refining industry has seen HFCS sales steadily decline.

The sugar producers charge the defendants with trying to resuscitate HFCS sales through a marketing blitz aimed at changing consumer perceptions of HFCS by equating it with real sugar. The defendants are attempting to do so, allege the sugar producers, by marketing HFCS as a natural sugar that is simply extracted from corn, which is not true.

While the corn refining industry has petitioned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approval to substitute “corn sugar” for “high-fructose corn syrup” on ingredient labels, the sugar-producing plaintiffs assert that the defendants did not even wait for the FDA’s response before beginning their “corn sugar” branding efforts. The complaint states that “Defendants’ resort to such literally false and misleading statements harms consumers, harms the makers of real sugar and harms any dialogue based on the truth. This lawsuit seeks to put an end to the deception.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: hfcs; sugar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 05/22/2011 1:27:47 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

2 posted on 05/22/2011 1:28:43 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
Link to Article
3 posted on 05/22/2011 1:29:57 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Why don’t the sugar companies get congress to drop the high tarriffs and subsidies and compete in a free market ...


4 posted on 05/22/2011 1:31:16 PM PDT by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Cancer cells slurp up fructose, US study finds

Study shows fructose used differently from glucose

* Findings challenge common wisdom about sugars

WASHINGTON Aug 2 (Reuters) - Pancreatic tumor cells use fructose to divide and proliferate, U.S. researchers said on Monday in a study that challenges the common wisdom that all sugars are the same.

Tumor cells fed both glucose and fructose used the two sugars in two different ways, the team at the University of California Los Angeles found.

They said their finding, published in the journal Cancer Research, may help explain other studies that have linked fructose intake with pancreatic cancer, one of the deadliest cancer types.

More here:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/08/02/cancer-fructose-idAFN0210830520100802


5 posted on 05/22/2011 1:35:22 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2723427/posts


6 posted on 05/22/2011 1:37:03 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

The FDA has stuck its nose in regulating everything else why not HFCS? Could it be that Archer Daniels Midland and the corn lobby have powerful friends in Congress and deep pockets for campaign donations?


7 posted on 05/22/2011 1:37:31 PM PDT by The Great RJ (1`1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

I once tried to grow sugar, but the plants were too crumbly.


8 posted on 05/22/2011 1:37:52 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
I don't need studies to tell me that high fructose corn syrup is a bad idea. Even beyond all of the studies, there is for me any way another big difference. That would be that food or beverages sweetened with a few packets of real sugar taste better and satisfy my hunger more quickly and fully.

There has to be a connection between HFCS and the obesity-diabetes epidemic. That would be because HFCS just about completely replaced natural sugar as a sweetener when the epidemic took hold. It would be amazing if it is a coincidence.

9 posted on 05/22/2011 1:50:48 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania

I see that Dole is now listing “Sugar” as an ingredient. But I don’t trust them. Might still be HFCS. And, the new “Sensations” line is awful!.


10 posted on 05/22/2011 1:58:17 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac
Bingo!!

Sugar prices are significantly lower here in Canada, than in the U.S. We don't subsidize the (beet) sugar industry, nor protect it with special tariffs. Most of our sugar is imported, at the world price — which is a lot lower than the protected price big sugar extracts from the U.S. consumer and tax payer.

The protectionism for big sugar resulted in the switch, by big food processors, to “corn sugar” (HFCS). HFCS (produced from the product of yet another heavily subsidized agribusiness) is cheaper than the overpriced sugar.

Government policies created the artificially high demand for HFCS. Now, ironically, more government intervention is being demanded to fix the problems that government intervention created.

You summed up the issue more succinctly than I; and have (IMHO) identified the only solution.

11 posted on 05/22/2011 1:59:17 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

“The protectionism for big sugar resulted in the switch, by big food processors, to “corn sugar” (HFCS).”

The other way around. See my related post:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2723427/posts?page=40#40


12 posted on 05/22/2011 2:10:02 PM PDT by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

I found some Mexican Coke at Sam’s. It’s made with real sugar. My brother has found some Passover Coke (also made with sugar: kosher, unlike HFCS: not kosher).


13 posted on 05/22/2011 2:16:07 PM PDT by Maurice Tift (You can't stop the signal, Mal. You can never stop the signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac
That was an informative post — but, I fail to see how it was the other way around, from what I said. The high tariffs imposed on sugar (I didn't know when that started, until I read your post), amount to the protectionism for big sugar that I mentioned. What am I missing?
14 posted on 05/22/2011 2:19:36 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!; DannyTN

***I once tried to grow sugar, but the plants were too crumbly.****

I never could get the cubes to sprout.


15 posted on 05/22/2011 2:21:37 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name. See my home page, if you dare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Sorry. I misread your post.


16 posted on 05/22/2011 2:23:47 PM PDT by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
The corn industry donates millions to Democrats.

Got the picture?

17 posted on 05/22/2011 2:29:19 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Liberal Jews who vote for Obama deserve the Sharia Law he intends to bring about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
"According to the complaint, consumers have increasingly sought to avoid food and drinks containing HFCS, because of its possible role in the obesity epidemic and other nutritional and health problems, or simply to avoid non-natural ingredients." (emphasis mine)

How can this be? The anti HFCS folks claim that there is medical and scientific proof that HFCS is the cause of everything except athelete's foot. Rotting livers and mercury poisoning are killing half of the population, all due to HFCS.

Yet, in this article we have the "possible" role of HFCS in obesity and other health problems. Things that make you go hmmmmmmmm ...

18 posted on 05/22/2011 2:30:06 PM PDT by JustaDumbBlonde (Don't wish doom on your enemies. Plan it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac

Then we agree ... sweet.


19 posted on 05/22/2011 2:31:07 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
I very rarely touch soda now mainly because of HFCS. I mostly do the Japanese Cold Green tea by Itoen which has no sugar of any kind. I drank a lot of it when I was in Japan. Unfortunately, it is just about in everything now and usually like doing Organ food.

The stuff should be banned !
20 posted on 05/22/2011 2:41:53 PM PDT by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson