Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama lie: Oil company business expenses are “tax giveaways”
Radio Vice Online ^ | May 14, 2011 | Steve McGough

Posted on 05/14/2011 6:39:04 PM PDT by Steve495

This is out of control. On May 3 I wrote about how the left, President Obama and Democrats can’t admit that what they refer to as major “subsidies” are simply ordinary business expenses. Now Obama has used the word “giveaways” in a direct email campaign looking for donations.

...

"The CEOs from the five major oil companies — which together booked $36 billion in profits in the first quarter of 2011 alone — went to the Senate on Thursday to try to justify the $4 billion in tax giveaways they’re receiving this year."

Read more...

(Excerpt) Read more at radioviceonline.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: expenses; obama; oil; profits
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 05/14/2011 6:39:13 PM PDT by Steve495
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steve495

I truly believe that most liberals have no clue about the finances of companies and the necessity of costs. Unless of course its the cost of running government programs.


2 posted on 05/14/2011 6:42:11 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve495

U.S. oil companies pay $89 million dollars in taxes every day.That’s not enough for our bloated, greedy government. And they produce an essential product for the nation at great expense. The government produces nothing but regulations and worthless vote-buying schemes that have bankrupted the richest country in the history of the world.

Why are oil company execs hauled before Congress to be harassed by these over-paid slugs?


3 posted on 05/14/2011 6:45:30 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Somehow oil companies are “special.” Liberals wouldn’t have a problem with Ben & Jerry’s deducting expenses from revenue to calculate taxable profit.


4 posted on 05/14/2011 6:45:59 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: kittymyrib

They do not pay, they collect taxes. Both sides need to stop lying about this stuff. There is no reason to allow depletion below a certain level of cost. No one is guaranteed a 100% return on their investment.


6 posted on 05/14/2011 6:53:32 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steve495

So by this logic, as a business owner I can not deduct the cost of computers, software, tools, parts, cost of labor paid to designers, technicians, construction craft. Why be in business then? Why work? Who is John Galt?


7 posted on 05/14/2011 7:01:51 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (All Hail the No Talent Pop Star pResident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve495

The article is wrong as well, I’m afraid. It implies that Big Oil continues to get these subsidies and explains why they are justified.

BIG OIL HAS BEEN INELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE THESE TAX BENEFITS SINCE 1976!

Fox also keeps misstating this. You would almost think that they don’t watch their own network. Please watch this video. It is a former Democratic congressman from Texas who warns of the consequences if Obama continues to repeat this lie:

http://conservatives4palin.com/2011/04/democrat-martin-frost-effectively-concedes-palins-analysis-of-the-oil-industry-is-accurate.html


8 posted on 05/14/2011 7:04:37 PM PDT by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve495

Thanks for the post - I’ve been wondering what this was all about. None of the stories I’ve read in the MSM detail exactly what the handouts are.


9 posted on 05/14/2011 7:08:49 PM PDT by andyk (Wealth != Income)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve495

Crap, you would think that someone bothering to type a fact in all caps would not make a typo on the year.

Should have been 1975.

sheesh... :)


10 posted on 05/14/2011 7:09:59 PM PDT by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daisyjane69

You’re right ... even Fox and CNBC have been awful in their reporting of this story. Especially O’Reilly, whose opinions are startlingly deficient in facts.


11 posted on 05/14/2011 7:11:49 PM PDT by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Daisyjane69
Just because Fox isn't as bad as the other networks doesn't mean it is good.

This afternoon I heard one of their reporters pronounce "corps" as in "Army Corps of Engineers" as "corpse." Obviously a Democrat imitating Obama's pronunciation of the word.

12 posted on 05/14/2011 7:13:31 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: andyk

The hearings were televised. Sen. Schumer was at his usual level of obnoxiousness. When international companies pay taxes for their overseas revenues, they are not expected to pay them again here. That’s called double taxation. They deduct those taxes as expenses. It’s the same as if you lived in one state and worked in another. You don’t pay taxes on the whole amount in both states. They take into consideration you’ve payed some in the first state. Big Oil could easily transfer the headquarters to The Caymans and not repatriate their profits here and avoid taxes altogether (the way GE does it).


13 posted on 05/14/2011 7:15:58 PM PDT by BipolarBob (The Obama COLB was just a joke folks. The real one is in Kenya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Skepolitic

speaking of BOR, Stossel is having a special on energy running on Fox right now. He just showed a quote from BOR demanding to know why the price of oil is fixed.

Evidently BOR has yet to hear of that newfangled thingy, known as commodity markets, and doesn’t understand that the world sets the price. Not American oil companies.


14 posted on 05/14/2011 7:17:38 PM PDT by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steve495

15 posted on 05/14/2011 7:27:33 PM PDT by 4Liberty (88% of Americans are NON-UNION. We value honest, peaceful Free trade-NOT protectionist CARTELS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Here's the deal ~ this is what Leftwingtards not only don't want to recognize, they can't. It's just beyond their mental acuity.

Let's say we have an oil company. It makes $10 billion in capital investment this year. It gets 4 years to depreciate it (that is, take it as an ordinary expense) at the rate of $2.5 billion per annum for the next four years.

Assuming interest rates are nearly 0$% (which they are), that would give the oil company $2.5 this year, next year, the year after, and the year after that.

The Democrat proposal is to stretch that out to 5 years.

That would give the oil company $2.0 deductible this year, $2.0 the next year, $2.0 the next year, the next year, and the following year.

BTW, any Democrats following this the total deductions under the current standard will be $10 billion. Under the Democrat proposal they are also $10 billion.

The tax rate is constant for each year, so more taxes will be collected this year than otherwise planned, but in the end the same amount of tax is collected over 4 years of depreciation as over 5 years of depreciation.

The big factor is the interest rate. The federal treasury will not offset more interest with 5 years than 4. The net gain to the government is $0.

Now, what's the problem? Costs the companies nothing and the government gets nothing, so it's all zero, right?

Well, not quite. That half billion dollars not available this year will result in a loss of 10,000 jobs paying an average of $50,000 per year.

In short, this NULL CASE shenanigan with capital depreciation taxes the working class making less than $250,000 per year in the most direct way ~ they simply lose their jobs.

16 posted on 05/14/2011 7:32:11 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

They know. They just believe that most people are too stupid to know that businesses pass on taxes to their customers as a cost of doing business.


17 posted on 05/14/2011 7:35:47 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
"depletion" really isn't the issue in the Dem proposal. They're simply talking about periods of depreciation applicable to expenses classified as capital investment.

One of the "costs" I didn't mention, is the lease costs that won't be paid to the government if the oil companies don't have that extra half billion to invest ~ and those lease costs sometimes turn into producing oil wells that pay royalties to the government.

So, you end up losing tens of thousands of jobs, or lease payments, or royalties.

When you get to "depletion" what happens when you reduce that is companies start turning off their more expensive to operate old wells and you get less domestic production. That means you have to import more oil.

You'll never go wrong assuming two things ~ that Democrats are IGNANT of math and they hate America and are trying to destroy our country.

18 posted on 05/14/2011 7:36:24 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

I truly believe that most liberals have no clue about the finances of companies and the necessity of costs. Unless of course its the cost of running government programs.”

Liberals haven’t a clue about what it costs to run a government program nor do they care - it’s Other People’s Money. Congress and the President have no clue about the cost of running a company or a government program and they don’t care - it’s Other People’s Money.


19 posted on 05/14/2011 7:36:41 PM PDT by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
Unless of course its the cost of running government programs.

They don't have the first frikin' clue about that either...

20 posted on 05/14/2011 8:05:34 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (I tweet, too...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson