Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The NJ Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision telling Christie to better-fund low-income school districts. On a radio show, the host asked Christie if he could just ignore the court, and Christie replied that that was an option that he had thought of.

Sounds like the Philly Inky is blowing this up a bit in order to force the gov to declare the option is not on the table, but if Christie DID tell the NJ court to stuff it, it would be REALLY interesting.

The NJ Supreme Court is just one of three branches of NJ government. If they can order the other two branches, then what is the point of the other two branches?

1 posted on 04/24/2011 11:26:13 AM PDT by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: PapaBear3625

This is why I will never live in NJ. The entitlement attitude extends to all parts of the state, including the entitlement to a “thorough and efficient” education. Move out of the state folks. Starve it to death by having no one to tax.

JoMa


2 posted on 04/24/2011 11:28:54 AM PDT by joma89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625
"On a radio show, the host asked Christie if he could just ignore the court, and Christie replied that that was an option that he had thought of."

However, the MSM and the libs are just fine with the Obama administration ignoring the DOMA.

3 posted on 04/24/2011 11:38:54 AM PDT by TennesseeGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625
The poorest performing school districts in the state already have among the highest spending per pupil. Shouldn't the ruling mandate diverting funds away from the urban districts to the suburban districts?


4 posted on 04/24/2011 11:41:46 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

Only if Christie backs down.


5 posted on 04/24/2011 11:41:46 AM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

Unless the NJ Constitution grants the Court the power to make or change law, the governor can ignore any court ruling that oversteps the bounds of the Courth’s authority. As is clearly the case here.


6 posted on 04/24/2011 11:41:53 AM PDT by sourcery (If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

The court will “win” this battle but the people of New Jersey will lose and eventually education as a whole will suffer.

We are coming to the end game of the Socialist Ponzi Scheme. So many have been promised so much, yet the money is running out.

So the courts will order more money spent on schools, that money will have to come from somewhere. Other functions will have to be cut or taxes will have to be raised.

As someone pointed out on another thread, the United States is reaching a tipping point. It is going to get ugly before all this is over.


7 posted on 04/24/2011 11:44:16 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (California does not have a money problem, it has a spending problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

All Christie has to do, according to the old ruling, is make school funding “equitable”, ie., slice up the state’s available pie in equal pieces. If the court tries to tell Christie to simply “increase funding”, then that is something new and is a leap from the old “equitable” ruling.

...In which case Christie BETTER tell the scumbags in black robes to go play in the street.
That ain’t their job.


11 posted on 04/24/2011 12:03:28 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

Just add $1 to each school’s budget. Then let them sue again. Rinse and repeat.


12 posted on 04/24/2011 12:04:08 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

Similarly, oil rich states should tell the federal government to stuff it and go ahead and authorize drilling on their own.


15 posted on 04/24/2011 12:28:12 PM PDT by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625
Ignoring courts is anarchy.
16 posted on 04/24/2011 12:58:50 PM PDT by Glenn (iamtheresistance.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

Seems like the first place to find the money is cutting all funding to the Supreme Court.


17 posted on 04/24/2011 1:09:05 PM PDT by RWAubrey ("Men sleep peacefully in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

And if he does defy the court, he’ll be just like Obamao defying the Florida court decision against Obamaocare.


18 posted on 04/24/2011 1:11:40 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Follow me on Twitter @mpetrie98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

This writer is the full time ‘dig up dirt on Christie” twit.
seriously!


20 posted on 04/24/2011 1:13:03 PM PDT by aumrl (let's keep it real Conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

Look, the branches have to have CHECKS on each other...for the past GENERATION, nothing has been put in the way of a runaway rogue court.

The Massachusetts SCOTUS gay ruling was one of the most heinous.

The NJ Supreme Court cannot be allowed to write legislation. That is NOT their job.


24 posted on 04/24/2011 1:19:30 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

Look, the branches have to have CHECKS on each other...for the past GENERATION, nothing has been put in the way of a runaway rogue court.

The Massachusetts SC gay ruling was one of the most heinous.

The NJ Supreme Court cannot be allowed to write legislation. That is NOT their job.


25 posted on 04/24/2011 1:19:50 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625; Dark Wing; Dog Gone

This is a real interesting constitutional separation of powers issue. It depends very much on the wording of New Jersey’s state constitution and the statute in question, which the MSM will never print, let alone understand. We’re better off looking that up on legal blogs like the Volokh Conspiracy.


27 posted on 04/24/2011 1:36:43 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

Leftist, activist judges will never allow lawmakers to make the law, Christie. Sure to GOD you must know that. So you might as well make your stand NOW. Nothing will change down the road.


30 posted on 04/24/2011 1:52:40 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

Sooner or later, leftist activists on the bench will HAVE to be told to go to hell. What better guy to do it than a governor??!!


31 posted on 04/24/2011 1:54:21 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

Just ignore em’. Seems to work for the Obozo.


34 posted on 04/24/2011 2:57:15 PM PDT by technically right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625
The legal doctrine of judicial review, that is that courts have the right to finally settle constitutional interpretive issues, considered sacrosanct by lawyers and law scholars of all kinds now, was NOT considered settled at all, when first, at the federal level, brought up in Marbury v. Madision. In fact, for decades after that early 19th Century decision it was pretty much ignored by presidents and Congress.

It really is true that, a (state or federal) "Court is just one of three branches of ... government. If they can order the other two branches, then what is the point of the other two branches?"

I believe that eventually constitutional governance will only be preserved when one of the branches simply says "stuff it!" to our imperial court system.

38 posted on 04/24/2011 4:41:54 PM PDT by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson