Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Uncharitable Zakat is not about charity, but jihad
National Review ^ | Andrew C. McCarthy

Posted on 04/23/2011 8:19:46 AM PDT by ventanax5

‘In the United States, rules on charitable giving have made it harder for Muslims to fulfill their religious obligation,” President Obama claimed during his 2009 Cairo speech. “That is why I am committed to working with American Muslims to ensure that they can fulfill zakat.”

This statement contained two falsehoods. One, as I’ve previously detailed, was obvious: There are, in fact, no American laws or rules that make it harder for Muslims to give to charity. What we have are laws against material support of terrorism — against using devices like charitable fronts to channel money to jihadists. Those laws are not directed at Muslims. They apply to everyone but are applied most often to Muslims, because Muslims carry out most anti-American terrorism.

The other falsehood was more subtle: the president’s suggestion that the religious obligation of zakat — one of the “five pillars of Islam” — is the equivalent of “charitable giving.” It is not. Zakat is every Muslim’s obligation to contribute to the fortification of the ummah, the notional worldwide Islamic nation. And that very much includes the funding of violent jihad against non-Muslims.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: charity; enemywithin; islam; law; obama; sharia; whitehousemuslim; wot; zakat

1 posted on 04/23/2011 8:19:48 AM PDT by ventanax5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

obamma is a muslim, hiding behind a Christian facade.


2 posted on 04/23/2011 8:22:17 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5
Let's try that again, shall we?

‘In the United States, rules on charitable giving have made it harder for Muslims Christians to fulfill their religious obligation,” President Obama claimed during his 2009 Cairo speech. “That is why I am committed to working with American Muslims Christians to ensure that they can fulfill zakat Christ's command to help the poor.”

We can plainly see that 0bama's statement would violate the liberal interpretation of the Establishment clause. On the conservative side, there can be now law that favors one religion over another. Of course, disregarding the First Amendment when it comes to any religion other than Christianity is perfectly OK with the left.

3 posted on 04/23/2011 8:25:00 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5
I had a rough idea about the Islamic law of zakat before reading this article. I have a clear idea now.
4 posted on 04/23/2011 8:25:42 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5
Thanks for re-posting this much needed to be read article since the first one drew only a couple of replies.
5 posted on 04/23/2011 8:56:06 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

An excellent article. I think it’s pretty clear that we have a muslim in the white house.


6 posted on 04/23/2011 9:34:54 AM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

Thanks for the post


7 posted on 04/23/2011 9:37:00 AM PDT by algernonpj (He who pays the piper . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

“I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” —Barry Soetoro AKA Barack Hussein Obama


8 posted on 04/23/2011 10:31:44 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5
What we have are laws against material support of terrorism — against using devices like charitable fronts to channel money to jihadists.

Details, details...

9 posted on 04/23/2011 10:56:27 AM PDT by Moltke (Always retaliate first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

I am forwarding this article to friends who may need educating on what we are up against.


10 posted on 04/23/2011 12:10:10 PM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

Thanks. McCarthy is one of the few going against the mainstream editorial position of NR favoring the US involvement in Libya. He sees the Muslims like they are.


11 posted on 04/24/2011 7:59:35 AM PDT by dervish (One person's Libyan al Qaeda terrorist is another person's Libyan freedom fighter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson