Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Constitution Doesn't Mention Czars
WSJ ^ | April 11, 2011q | GEORGE P. SCHULTZ

Posted on 04/11/2011 9:09:09 AM PDT by Kaslin

Unaccountable White House aides are a product of a broken cabinet-nomination process. This is not the form of government the Founders intended.

A pattern of governance has emerged in Washington that departs substantially from that envisaged in our Constitution. Under our basic concept of governance: (1) a president and vice president are elected; and (2) the departments of government are staffed by constitutional officers including secretaries, undersecretaries, assistant secretaries and others who are nominated by the president and confirmed for service by the consent of the Senate. They are publicly accountable and may be called to testify under oath about their activities.

Over time, this form of governance has changed. Presidents sometimes assume that the bureaucracy will try to capture a secretary and his or her immediate staff so that they will develop a departmental, rather than a White House, point of view. So presidents will name someone in the White House to oversee the department and keep a tight rein on its activities.

In national security and foreign policy, the National Security Council (NSC) was established after World War II by the National Security Act of 1947. As late as 1961, under President Dwight Eisenhower, the NSC was supported by a small staff headed by an executive secretary with a "passion for anonymity" and limited to a coordinating role. In subsequent administrations, that passion disappeared and staff members took on operational duties that formerly were the responsibility of constitutionally confirmed cabinet officials. This aggrandizement of the staff function then spread into fields far beyond national security.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: czars; georgeschultz

1 posted on 04/11/2011 9:09:11 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The problem that all Cabinet level Secretaries face is their supporting bureaucracies.

Shortly after being confirmed as a Secretary their primary job shifts from supporting the President to supporting their bureaucracies. Within two years they re so tied up defending their subordinates against all comers that they cease being the President's advocate.

Unfortunately this political reality extends all the way down to the municipal level and has become part and particle part of the American political process.

2 posted on 04/11/2011 9:43:05 AM PDT by Nip (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Constitution Doesn't Mention Czars

It does not provide for a king either, but that doesn't seem to stop Obama from trying to become one.

3 posted on 04/11/2011 11:01:03 AM PDT by Mark17 (California, where English is a foreign language)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nip
The problem that all Cabinet level Secretaries face is their supporting bureaucracies.

Then fire the lot of them and start over. Or better yet get rid of half the Departments, Bureaus, and Agencies and this problem will largely disappear.

4 posted on 04/11/2011 11:04:52 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson