Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LucyT

ping


2 posted on 04/04/2011 2:05:30 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

I don’t have the reference handy, but, after detailed analysis, the announcements in the two newspapers are in identical order for August 14th and nowhere else. The announcement pages were clearly forged!


6 posted on 04/04/2011 2:12:11 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Fractal Trader; faucetman; warsaw44; ColdOne; Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!; GQuagmire; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

With new information emerging now, O’Reilly may be interested to learn that the announcement images that were posted online cannot be from the microfilms we were told they were from.

This article documents that the stories we were told were a well-orchestrated lie, which raises serious questions about the microfilms O’Reilly says he has found, since those lies back in 2008 would not have been necessary if the microfilms O’Reilly relies on today had actually been in the libraries in 2008.

Who orchestrated those lies in July of 2008, and why? O’Reilly might want to send his investigators out to find the answers to those questions, since it is o'Reilly's credibility – not Trump’s – which is on the line now.

Thanks, Fractal Trader.

46 posted on 04/04/2011 5:43:41 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson