...considering his track record, it will be another failure.
Everything this clown touches turns to kaka...
Imminent... there's that word again.
The Left went after Bush because the WMD threat wasn't "imminent" in their eyes.
-PJ
This WH is filled with Code Pinko types. Obama won the nomination as an anti war leftist.
They can only put on a facade for so long until they crack.
As soon as “days” turn into weeks, and God forbid if boots hit the ground, the push back will be ugly.
“If Gaddafi were not stopped, he said, “the words of the international community would be rendered hollow.”
Apparently that logic was impermissible when a Republican president elected to apply it to a dictator who had thumbed his nose at UN sanctions and a no-fly zone for roughly a decade.
O hearts W.
Remember when Bush was Prez? Media whackjobs screamed from the rooftops whenever they found a dissenter....but with Hussein, they keep it on the downlow.
The list, ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
(0dumb0 strikes again)
This senior official actually understates the danger. By undermining Mubarak and attacking Kaddafi, Obama is helping al Qaeda and associates in EVERY Muslim state where these “popular” revolts are taking place.
And he’s damaging black Africa as well. He already pushed for sharia law and abortion in Kenya, which was strongly resisting both, until he worked his church-burning cousin Railla Odinga in there.
Kaddafi was a friend to Africa. He gave them jobs and helped them with development projects. He may have been motivated more by egoism than anything else, but never mind, he was doing a lot of good. That’s why the African nations strongly oppose this so-called “no fly” scam.
If you close your eyes and have someone read this to you out loud, it sounds an awful lot like Hillary or Bill.
Let the games begin.
“The thrust of the article is that the war in Libya will help the view of proponents in the administration to lay the predicate for future ‘humanitarian’ wars. However the important part is that the administration is knowingly risking aiding al Qaeda while ‘straining’ the truth about explaining the intervention to the American people.”
Essential to point out there was an article last night in which it was broached that Samantha Powers convinced SOS Hillary clinton of the necessity to participate in the assault on Libya, and in turn the two of them apparently convinced Obama to reverse his course on the matter, and this against the wishes of all of his military advisers from the Pentagon, and otherwise.
Samantha Powers is an advocate of whatchamacallit R2P, or something that sounds like that, which is the “Humanitarian war”. IOW a Leftist agenda war using our military for their goals as I read it, therefore it’s not a wonder Obama is strained attempting to explain it to the American people as is reported in your article.
Samantha Powers is of Irish birth, and a all out Communist Obama nominated to the National Security Council, and is a trusted advisor to Obama. She is the one that was allegedly thrown under the bus for calling Hillary a “Monster” during the campaign in 2008, and was later quietly reinstated in the good graces of the Messiah. She seems to have much influence with him, perhaps not to the level of Iranian-American Communist Valerie Jarrett, but seemingly quite a bit.
A couple of cents worth from the RQSR.
bump