Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: socialism_stinX
I didn't think a reactor problem would take 12+ hours to develop.

I really only understand enough about this technology...

but did this problem happen when the earthquake struck and they are only now trickling out information about the seriousness of the situation?

11 posted on 03/11/2011 4:49:35 PM PST by Never on my watch (WTF happened to my country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Never on my watch
OOPS ....

I really DON'T understand enough about this technology...

17 posted on 03/11/2011 4:53:08 PM PST by Never on my watch (WTF happened to my country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Never on my watch; Robert A. Cook, PE
I didn't think a reactor problem would take 12+ hours to develop.

The problem (as I understand it; I'm an engineer but not a NucE) is that the reactor core is so hot that even if you shut it down immediately in the earthquake, which these were designed to do and in fact did, it takes 24 to 48 hours to bring the core down to a temperature where it won't melt down if not cooled.

Apparently the loss of the backup/emergency diesel generators to the tsunami left them with only 8 hours of battery-powered cooling. Not enough.

(I got to tour an aircraft carrier a few years ago, and was a bit surprised that it took something like 48 hours or so --number forgotten-- to get the reactor up to operating temp. Not a case of inserting the key, turning the ignition switch, and roaring off.)

95 posted on 03/11/2011 6:42:52 PM PST by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|http://pure-gas.org|Must be a day for changing taglines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson