Sometimes the truth hurts, I guess. If you think what I posted was a "straw man" argument, then you don't understand the term, which wouldn't surprise me.
"You must have been a hell of a lawyer."
Believe me, it doesn't take a lawyer to understand (and point out) how facially absurd your argument was.
By the way, if you want legal speak, I'd start with mens rea, and work from there.
Once again, you're the expert. If my argument is "facially absurd" then you should have been able to explain why in one post, instead of name calling in three.