Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brown drops controversial plan to sell state buildings
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 2/9/11 | Wyatt Buchanan, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau

Posted on 02/09/2011 10:38:13 AM PST by SmithL

Sacramento -- California will not go through with its controversial plan to sell state buildings then lease them back to help plug the budget deficit, Gov. Jerry Brown announced this morning.

The proposed sale of the California Supreme Court headquarters in San Francisco and ten other buildings would have raised $1.2 billion for the state but critics argued that the state ultimately would have lost $1.4 billion by leasing back those buildings over a 35 year period.

"The sale of the buildings really didn't make much sense,"...

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: caassets; goldenstate; moonbeam; smokeandmirriors; yourtaxdollarsatwork

1 posted on 02/09/2011 10:38:17 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Make today better by taxing the future. Don’t address today’s spending excesses. Same old liberal playbook.


2 posted on 02/09/2011 10:51:09 AM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Should sell off the buildings.

House the Government employees in GP medium tents. In the winter they get a 55 gallon drum to burn trash in to stay warm. In the summer, wet down the sides of the tent.


3 posted on 02/09/2011 10:54:32 AM PST by DariusBane (People are like sheep and have two speeds: grazing and stampede)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Yes. I guess they finally realized doing this was just like getting a loan, except instead of issuing a bunch of California IOUs, they would have actual consequences and get evicted.


4 posted on 02/09/2011 10:56:48 AM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Jaaa. didn’t make much sense..

aRnie’s Legacy


5 posted on 02/09/2011 11:20:11 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The sale of the buildings really didn't make much sense

You mean "Sell low, lease back high" is not good advice?

6 posted on 02/09/2011 11:22:26 AM PST by omega4412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

It is kind of too bad - I was anticipating the headlines...

CA GOV evicted for nonpayment of rent...

etc.

Would have made great humor.


7 posted on 02/09/2011 11:28:42 AM PST by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: patton
Who would want to buy the government buildings? The commercial real estate market is in the tank. Unless, Gov. Brown wants to sell to the Chicoms? What a genius move!
8 posted on 02/09/2011 11:34:39 AM PST by MasterGunner01 (To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

Many companies buy government facilities for tax purposes.


9 posted on 02/09/2011 11:41:05 AM PST by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

In the right real estate market this WOULD make sense. Of course, commercial real estate in Kalifornia is a buyers market right now.


10 posted on 02/09/2011 12:54:31 PM PST by jdsteel (I like the way the words "Palin for President" drive progressives absolutely crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The purchase of the buildings never made sense. The reason they won’t sell them is that they are afraid to fire all of the useless bureaucrats that occupy them.


11 posted on 02/09/2011 12:55:59 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Buyer was reported to be a group headed by Kiane Feinstein’s husband. Hardly an ‘arm’s length’ transaction.


12 posted on 02/09/2011 1:17:18 PM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Buyer was reported to be a group headed by Diane Feinstein’s husband. Hardly an ‘arm’s length’ transaction.


13 posted on 02/09/2011 1:18:27 PM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton
Given the attitude of California towards business and corporations, the Chicom purchase option is probably the best route. After all, the Chinese are already communist and they'd fit right into the quasi-socialist state run by Governor Moonbeam and the loons in the legislature. We will have to break the news, gently, that the Chicom government cannot -- for cause -- terminate with extreme prejudice the current batch of criminals in the legislative and executive branches.
14 posted on 02/09/2011 3:51:12 PM PST by MasterGunner01 (To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

True - but it would have been funny as heck to see them evict the legislature for non-payment of rent.

I wonder if the CA SSC stoped the thing?

They are not known for their sense of humor, and their building was on the block.

Probably had the Chief Justice call moonbeam, and tell him, Oh, heck no.

LOL.

Of course, I wanted to see Blago’s security detail pull the motorcade over, put him out on the curb, and drive off...

Didn’t happen, but it would have been funny.

You never know, we might someday see Marine One land suddenly, and disembark the resident...


15 posted on 02/09/2011 4:25:41 PM PST by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01
Who would want to buy the government buildings? The commercial real estate market is in the tank.

The buyer was making out like a bandit. Buy on the cheap and have guaranteed tenancy for 20 years, at above market rates.

Purchase of the buildings made plenty of sense. What didn't make sense was the sale of the buildings.

16 posted on 02/09/2011 4:34:16 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Sapere Aude!" --Immanuel Kant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson