. . . . . "goal of Global islamic conquest."
Posted on 02/08/2011 8:44:08 PM PST by Nachum
Translated by Palestinian Media Watch, book details group’s goal of global Islamic conquest.
One of the greatest beneficiaries of the unrest in Egypt has been the Muslim Brotherhood.
Banned but tolerated for decades by successive Egyptian regimes, the Islamist movement is now emerging as a central player in the country’s resurgent opposition.
On Tuesday, two Brotherhood representatives participated in an opposition delegation that met with Vice President Omar Suleiman for the first set of talks over implementing political reforms.
Pundits have portrayed the Brotherhood as uncompromising zealots or beneficent providers of social services that long-deprived Egyptians desperately need.
But a translation released Tuesday of a 1995 book by the movement’s fifth official leader sheds light on just how Egypt’s Brotherhood views itself and its mission. Jihad is the Way is the last of a five-volume work, The Laws of Da’wa by Mustafa Mashhur, who headed the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt from 1996-2002.
(Excerpt) Read more at jpost.com ...
Nachum, I can’t remember if I shared this with you already.
But, here is a pdf of the MB’s plans to integrate Islam into the US. ENGLISH TRANSLATION ON PAGE 15.
“An Explanatory Memorandum
On the General Strategic Goal for the Group
In North America
5/22/1991”
http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/20.pdf
bump
Very interesting. Very interesting indeed.
oh its O’s hood.
You probably pinged this out but if you didn’t here’s my placemark.
They are extremist. What they want is not a democracy but an Islamic Republic. Those who head the regime are aware they could hang on the end of the rope if they let go of power - its not in the West’s interest to bring a fascist movement to power in the Arab World’s most populous state.
. . . . . "goal of Global islamic conquest."
Reading up on Obama’s envoy to Egypt, Frank Wisner jr. and his father Frank Wisner Sr.’s activities in Egypt....along with the ties from Muslim Brotherhood to Hamas, Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and going back and seeing their formative years working with the Nazi Party...it’s horrifying.
I genuinely feel scared.
On Wisner family:
http://www.antifascistencyclopedia.com/allposts/frank-wisner-son-of-nazi-recruiting-cia-official-sent-to-prod-mubarak
http://www.thesuitmagazine.com/world/americas/140-frank-g-wisner-sr-the-ian-fleming-of-the-cold-war.html
On Nazi links:
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/arab-muslim-nazism-—documentation-your-reference-guide/question-1374831/
http://www.ifapray.org/archive/NFOW/NFOW2007/Al%20Fatah’s%20Nazi%20training%20was%20CIA-sponsored.html
Mother Jones reporting on Nazi funding of PLO:
http://books.google.com/books?id=recDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PT53&lpg=PT53&dq=PFLP+genoud&source=bl&ots=HU_XWTnbxg&sig=JS1Vvbo-s75Xicj4bRw0dbI8aOk&hl=en&ei=kdZNTbCFL4H58Ab2zZGcDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCcQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=PFLP%20genoud&f=false
Remember, Article 2, and Article 7 of the Hamas charter states that they are a chapter of Muslim Brotherhood.
mark
THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE NEEDS TO CEASE ALL AND INVESTIGATE ALL OF OBAMA’S RECESS SNEAK IN APPOINTMENTS AND END THIS GARBAGE!
Recall’ that it was widely reported overseas that Obama and Clinton were SECRETLY promoting the unrest in Egypt.
“But Chrissy said Glen was insane!” ~ ladyvet
As did a lot of power-hungry establishment RINOS.
However:
Rummy backs Beck’s suspicions:
EIB Interview: Donald Rumsfeld
February 8, 2011
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_020811/content/01125106.member.html
[huge snip]
RUMSFELD: No, they’re perfectly capable of lying, and they did. I mean take one of the rumors that was spread around the world about alleging that someone at Guantanamo Bay had flushed a Koran down the toilet. There were riots in three or four cities, people were killed, and by the time the truth came around that there never was a Koran flushed down the toilet at Guantanamo, it was absolutely false, and of course the journalist that did it then said if there was some portion of their story that was wrong, they’re sorry, but the people were dead already. So these things are important. The thing that was on the backside of that however is that there’s something about our country that we’re reluctant to engage in a competition of ideas in government. We are up against a vicious enemy, the radical Islamists are there, they intend to try to create a caliphate in this world and fundamentally alter the nature of nation states, and we’re reluctant to engage in the competition of ideas and point out what they really are and how vicious they are. This current administration is even afraid to say the word Islamist. And we need to fight. We need to be willing to say what it is and be willing to tackle it. And thank goodness for people like you who are willing to do it.
RUSH: In context of all that, what do you make of what’s happening in Egypt? So many people are confused. I must confess I’m having a tough time finding somebody I believe is able to convince me what this is really all about.
RUMSFELD: Let me make a couple of comments in that regard. First, it seems to me that what’s important is private diplomacy, not public diplomacy. Public diplomacy tends to be aimed not so much at the people you’re trying to persuade, but to satisfy your own base and to make yourself look good. And one knows that the private diplomacy is what ultimately is going to be important. So it’s not surprising that those of us on the outside don’t have a perfect fix on what’s taking place. Second, I would say that there are without question — first of all, Egypt’s an enormously important country. It’s large, it’s historically important. From an educational standpoint it’s a big factor in the Arab world and what happens there makes a big difference to us. As you know well, we watched what happened in Iran where there was a popular revolution and the people that were the best organized and the most vicious took over the country. And they didn’t end up with freer political systems or freer economic systems. They ended up with the ayatollahs controlling that country.
RUSH: Well, that’s the thing. Are we looking at something similar here or is this really — I mean there are people telling us this is a democracy movement, we need to be fully, fully behind what’s going on here. If that means the ouster of Mubarak, then we must be for it immediately. We’re hearing that argument as well.
RUMSFELD: Well, you can have a perfectly legitimate democracy movement where there are a variety of people across the political spectrum who all agree that there needs to be change. The problem is the people who tend to be the best organized are the most radical and the most vicious. And so you can have a broad popular democracy movement and have it end being taken over by the most vicious people and the result is you don’t end up with free political systems or free economic systems, you end up with a handful of radicals controlling the country. That’s the risk.
RUSH: We’re speaking with former Defense Secretary Ronald Rumsfeld, former secretary of practically everything in his career in the US government. Were we surprised at what happened in Iran when we decided the Shah had to go? Was there intel that the ayatollahs might take over and form an Islamist government as they have?
RUMSFELD: There was certainly intel that suggested that the return of the ayatollah from, as I recall, Paris to Iran and that there were people who had extreme views. I think that the actual departure of the Shah came as a surprise. I don’t think our intel suggested that. There was clearly information that there was concern about the secret police, the SAVAK during that period, and the country had not moved toward freer political and freer economic systems.
RUSH: Well, people have the same fear that the process is repeating itself in Egypt.
RUMSFELD: That’s true. I mean it’s a perfectly legitimate concern. How it will come out, we don’t know. But if you think about our world and the relatively small number of countries where people are doing well and have opportunity, those are the countries with the freer political and the freer economic systems. The places where people are not doing well — my favorite picture as you probably know is that picture of the Korean peninsula taken from a satellite at night, and the same people north and south, the same resources north and south, and below the demilitarized zone you have this brilliant light with the 12th or 13th largest economy on the face of the earth and up north people are starving because there’s a dictatorship up north and a free system down south.
RUSH: We’re speaking with former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
[snip] bttt
Hizb ut-Tahrir: Party of Liberation) is an international pan-Islamic political organisation whose goal is for all Muslim countries to unify as an Islamic state or caliphate ruled by Islamic law and with a caliph head of state elected by Muslims.
The organization was founded in 1953 in Jerusalem by Taqiuddin al-Nabhani, an Islamic scholar and appeals court judge (Qadi) from the Palestinian village of Ijzim. Since then Hizb ut-Tahrir has spread to more than 40 countries, and by one estimate has about one million members. Hizb ut-Tahrir is very active in the west, particularly in the United Kingdom, and is also active in several Arab and Central Asian countries, despite being banned by most of the local governments.
Hizb ut-Tahrir believes a caliphate would provide stability and security to both Muslims and Non-Muslims in the predominantly Muslim regions of the world. The party promotes a detailed program for institution of an Islamic state that would establish Shariah and carry “the Da’wah of Islam” to the world. It believes this political transformation would provide honest leadership, protecting and caring for its citizens, and fighting against the “colonial foreign policies” of the United States and other Western nations that have led to “U.S. interventions, energy inspired wars, puppet (Muslim) governments and western values forced by the barrel of a gun.” Hizb ut-Tahrir is also strongly anti-Zionist and calls for Israel, which it calls an “illegal entity,” to be dismantled.
Some observers believe Hizb ut-Tahrir is the victim of false allegations of connections to terrorism, pointing out that the organization explicitly commits itself to non-violence. Others argue that the group’s opposition to violence is tactical and temporary, and that it works to create a politically charged atmosphere conducive to terrorism.
Case in point. ‘Tolerance’ is, in reality, sowing the seeds of your own destruction.
What have we been tolerating here in the U.S.? The Hom0 agenda, illegal aliens, m0sques and isl@m, mass slaughter of the unborn, corruption at almost every level, the attempt to abolish Christianity and Natural Law, etc.
Like everything else in the Marxist playbook tolerance sounds good and reasonable. But it ends up being like termites in your house.
They don’t have enough guns
The following is a text of President Obama’s prepared remarks to the Muslim world, delivered on June 4, 2009, as released by the White House.
Related
Obama Calls for Alliances With Muslims (June 5, 2009)
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/05/world/middleeast/05prexy.html?_r=1&ref=politics
I am honored to be in the timeless city of Cairo, and to be hosted by two remarkable institutions. For over a thousand years, Al-Azhar has stood as a beacon of Islamic learning, and for over a century, Cairo University has been a source of Egypt’s advancement. Together, you represent the harmony between tradition and progress. I am grateful for your hospitality, and the hospitality of the people of Egypt. I am also proud to carry with me the goodwill of the American people, and a greeting of peace from Muslim communities in my country: assalaamu alaykum.
We meet at a time of tension between the United States and Muslims around the world – tension rooted in historical forces that go beyond any current policy debate. The relationship between Islam and the West includes centuries of co-existence and cooperation, but also conflict and religious wars. More recently, tension has been fed by colonialism that denied rights and opportunities to many Muslims, and a Cold War in which Muslim-majority countries were too often treated as proxies without regard to their own aspirations. Moreover, the sweeping change brought by modernity and globalization led many Muslims to view the West as hostile to the traditions of Islam.
Violent extremists have exploited these tensions in a small but potent minority of Muslims. The attacks of September 11th, 2001 and the continued efforts of these extremists to engage in violence against civilians has led some in my country to view Islam as inevitably hostile not only to America and Western countries, but also to human rights. This has bred more fear and mistrust.
So long as our relationship is defined by our differences, we will empower those who sow hatred rather than peace, and who promote conflict rather than the cooperation that can help all of our people achieve justice and prosperity. This cycle of suspicion and discord must end.
I have come here to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world; one based upon mutual interest and mutual respect; and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive, and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles – principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.
I do so recognizing that change cannot happen overnight. No single speech can eradicate years of mistrust, nor can I answer in the time that I have all the complex questions that brought us to this point. But I am convinced that in order to move forward, we must say openly the things we hold in our hearts, and that too often are said only behind closed doors. There must be a sustained effort to listen to each other; to learn from each other; to respect one another; and to seek common ground. As the Holy Koran tells us, “Be conscious of God and speak always the truth.” That is what I will try to do – to speak the truth as best I can, humbled by the task before us, and firm in my belief that the interests we share as human beings are far more powerful than the forces that drive us apart.
Part of this conviction is rooted in my own experience. I am a Christian, but my father came from a Kenyan family that includes generations of Muslims. As a boy, I spent several years in Indonesia and heard the call of the azaan at the break of dawn and the fall of dusk. As a young man, I worked in Chicago communities where many found dignity and peace in their Muslim faith.
As a student of history, I also know civilization’s debt to Islam. It was Islam – at places like Al-Azhar University – that carried the light of learning through so many centuries, paving the way for Europe’s Renaissance and Enlightenment. It was innovation in Muslim communities that developed the order of algebra; our magnetic compass and tools of navigation; our mastery of pens and printing; our understanding of how disease spreads and how it can be healed. Islamic culture has given us majestic arches and soaring spires; timeless poetry and cherished music; elegant calligraphy and places of peaceful contemplation. And throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/04/us/politics/04obama.text.html
http://www.conservapedia.com/Muslim_agenda_of_the_Obama_administration
Thanks for posting. I sent this to Peter King, Representative from NY, who is leading an investigaion into radical Islam. There is a pdf of the 15 page translation in the article that I would suggest we all download and save before it is “disappeared”.
I find it rather convincing that Barry's been in sync with the MB plan for many a year.
HF
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.