"Some reports are that Politico is this far
up the backside of Romney and Obama."
In a fictitious face off , PPP could prove Obama over Ronald Reagan by 20 points.
The survey 599 voters has a sampling error of 4 percent.
So 4% error each way may mean 51+4 = 55% disapproval for 0bama
57-4 = 53% unfavorable for Palin.
I think Palin has a better shot at improving her numbers than Barry.
Spreading the lies.
Public Policy Polling is useless. It might as well be called DNC Polling. Whomever they claim can’t beat Obama, just assume the opposite is true. In this case, it’s easy.
How do they explain the state having two republican senators, a republican governor, and a big republican majority in the legislature?
Oh, never mind, I forgot-—libs don’t know the meaning of the truth. In fact the truth is their worst enemy.
Doesn’t mean a lick until the campaign gets underway. It’s an effort to demoralize. Many here on FR are cheering with Obama and the msm. How does it feel to be on Obama’s team guys? If Sarah runs and all the polls show her down in the summer of 2012 then I’ll start to worry.
Just for a second, think about how incredibly dumb this poll is.
Palin was the FIRST one out of the chute to stand up for AZ’s citizens & Arizona’s governor, Jan Brewer, in defense of AZs immigration law. Palin even cut commercials to help the state raise money to defend the law. Gov. Brewer won re-election by a pretty healthy margin.
But I’m supposed to believe that Arizonans will vote for the guy whose administration is suing THEM and trying to prevent the implementation of that law? As opposed to the candidate that came out on the side of the citizensand actually helped them? Btw, Giffords barely won re-election in that state. But they want Obama, eh? LMAO
Sometimes the propaganda just takes off it’s clothes and stands nekkid right in front of you, so you can’t miss it.
"Some reports are that Politico is this far
up the backside of Romney and Obama."
I predict many more of these PPP polls showing Obama over Sarah.
Who is paying for them?
Newt, Mitt? or DeMmint?
PPL polls and all polls are meaningless until candidates actually announce. I don’t know why this rates as news, except at politico-obama.com?
In any campaign, the most prominent strategy is to deny your opponent’s electability.
Without regard to truth or accuracy.
I remember January and February 1991, when George Bush was so far up in the polls that pretty much nobody on the Democratic side wanted to run in 1992, except Jerry Brown...and Bill Clinton. Barry isn’t that far up. Nowhere near.
Yes, PPP is a Democrat outfit that oversamples Democrats and is using registered voters instead of likely voters. But we ignore at our own risk the fact that in poll after poll, irrespective of the pollster or the state being surveyed, Sarah Palin is running quite a bit behind the other Republican candidates in head-to-head matchups against Obama. Would Obama carry AZ over Palin? Of course not. But if Obama can hold on to OH, PA, MI and WI, he’ll be reelected. As much as I love Sarah, and believe that she would make a great president, I don’t want to see Obama get reelected because we nominated someone who would need to attain a remarkable improvement in public perception in order to win—remember what happened to Katherine Harris in 2006.
There are several other conservatives we can run for president who would have a much better chance of winning than would Gov. Palin; for example, even a longshot like Herman Cain would have a better chance, since he is largely unknown among voters and does not have to change drastically public perception of him, which would be Palin’s task should she run for president. And maybe Jim DeMint will run. While such candidates would start off behind in the polls to Obama, I guarantee you that Obama would be polling a much lower percentage against them than he has been polling against Palin (and there would be a much higher percentage of undecided voters). And, at the end of the day, Herman Cain and Jim DeMint are at least as conservative as Sarah is (and likely even more conservative), and will be able to bring out the conservative vote just as well as she could do (especially if Sarah campaigns for the GOP ticket, which I’m sure she would do if we nominate two conservatives).
Sarah Palin is still quite young, and she will have plenty of chances to run for president in the future. But 2012 does not look like a good year for her to run, unless she can completely change her public perception in 21 months.
One speech, or one debate, and all bets are off for the socialist scumbags.
I assume these same pollsters had Democrats picking up seats in the 2010 congressional election.
Dewey Defeats Truman.
Kos’s pollsters, and even they can’t get the incumbent over 50% against Palin—before she’s even started her campaign.
Ha ha!!!
Moogly ain’t going to beat the Lady. Period.
Public Policy Propaganda