Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NEA Gave More Than $13 Million to Advocacy Groups
Hot Air ^ | 01/22/11 | Mike Antonucci

Posted on 01/22/2011 4:19:08 PM PST by blueyon

An Education Intelligence Agency analysis of NEA’s financial disclosure report for the 2009-10 fiscal year reveals the national union contributed more than $13 million to a wide variety of advocacy groups and charities. The total was about half the amount disbursed in the previous year, though more than in 2007-08.

The expenditures fall into broad categories of community outreach grants, charitable contributions, and payments for services rendered. In this list, EIA has deliberately omitted spending such as media buys, or payments to pollsters or consultants that have no obvious ideological component. The grants range from $2.125 million to a California ballot initiative campaign, down to smaller grants to organizations such as People for the American Way, Media Matters and Netroots Nation.

Here is an alphabetic list of the 130 recipients of NEA’s contributions, with relevant web links. All of these were paid for with members’ dues money (the union’s federal PAC is a separate entity funded through voluntary means):

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: courruption; nea; obama; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
OK please straighten me out...are we paying our tax dollars so Congress can give some (tons) of funding to organizations like this who in turn pass out the money to other groups....and then scream that they do not have enough money for their own teachers?
1 posted on 01/22/2011 4:19:12 PM PST by blueyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blueyon

The NEA should not be getting money from taxpayers, period.


2 posted on 01/22/2011 4:21:16 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.stink-eye.net/forum/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Which NEA? Is this the private organization called National Education Association or the government agency called National Endowment for the Arts?


3 posted on 01/22/2011 4:26:03 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

The article says “national union” so I presume it is the leftist teacher’s association.


4 posted on 01/22/2011 4:32:30 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I assumed it is the National Education Assoc one as “An Education Intelligence Agency” was the one that did the analysis and the word “union” is mentioned.....

“An Education Intelligence Agency analysis of NEA’s financial disclosure report for the 2009-10 fiscal year reveals the national union contributed more than $13 million to a wide variety of advocacy groups and charities. The total was about half the amount disbursed in the previous year, though more than in 2007-08.”


5 posted on 01/22/2011 4:35:13 PM PST by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Then it's a PRIVATE ORGANIZATION. You may not like them, but they would be free to "donate" however they wish.

I don't think we have it on our agenda to begin crushing private organizations out of existence ~ that's the stuff Obama and his running dog lackeys are into.

If it's the National Endowment for the Arts it's possible that those groups got money for the purpose of dealing with some item of art, or an art or entertainment group (a local band perhaps?).

There's not enough information here for me to know what I'm supposed to be angry about and I DON'T LIKE THAT.

6 posted on 01/22/2011 4:36:29 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

National Education Association. The California initiative was to roll back tax breaks for business and NEA gave to advocate for increased taxes.


7 posted on 01/22/2011 4:38:06 PM PST by srajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Then it's a PRIVATE ORGANIZATION.

Which then has no Constitutional right to taxpayer funding. Cut them off completely. Now.

There's absolutely NO Constitutional authorization for that type of expenditure. None.

If you want to give to a private organization, get out your own damned checkbook.

L

8 posted on 01/22/2011 4:48:43 PM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Then it's a PRIVATE ORGANIZATION. You may not like them, but they would be free to "donate" however they wish.

I might agree if teachers were free to not join them or pay dues to them.
9 posted on 01/22/2011 4:57:52 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I just perused your homepage. Retired Government worker, I see.

No wonder you're so militant about sucking endless cash from helpless taxpayers.

Hey do you think those poor, misunderstood FEC drones deserve their pensions? Or are they the exception to your "give us all your money" rule?

10 posted on 01/22/2011 5:02:27 PM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
You think it pisses you all off?

NEA takes 1300 bucks a year from the wifey who has been a reg Repub for over 25 years. They have it broken down into negotiating fee & a few other fees so as it not to look quite so foul. They claim they only use 15 bucks for their pacs and reimburse the wife. This fall, she showed me a letter they sent saying she had to fill out card and send back to get the 15 bucks nx year, crazy.

I read the NEA today mag she gets and go ballistic; it's truly bizarre.

Twenty years back I was on this big kick to get her to quit the union. I found out pretty quick how they come after a teacher that attempts to do this; something to avoid actually unless you want to end the teaching career.

Way too much politics from the ultra left & ultra right concerning education in America. We should be more concerned about improving education, rate teachers, rate parents, benchmark the kids; and then make changes.

11 posted on 01/22/2011 5:05:06 PM PST by Eska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Ok add to the list of DEFUNDING priorities.

EPA-EDU-NEA-Interior-etc etc


12 posted on 01/22/2011 5:14:05 PM PST by Marty62 (Marty 60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Not to concern yourself. I'd have to live to nearly 200 years of age before a single tax dollar was required to deal with my pension. The part of the program I am part of is $78 billion above water too.

I paid for it myself.

Now, regarding your pension, I understand you robbed a bank and took a sack of marked bills with you.

Hahahahahahaha!

13 posted on 01/22/2011 5:17:03 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
They're teachers, right? They'd get duped out of their money anyway ~ wouldn't matter what it was for ~ dues, scotchtape for the kiddies, beer on Saturday evening ~ whatever.

Somebody's gotta' get cheated so why not them.

14 posted on 01/22/2011 5:19:06 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Eska

The only answer is to totally end the EDU. send edu back to the state and local citizens. Not the politicians and lobbiest in D.C.


15 posted on 01/22/2011 5:22:25 PM PST by Marty62 (Marty 60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Marty62
We actually ended negotiations in Virginia. Made it against the law for a school district to negotiate with the NEA or any other teacher's union.

You know what the result was? They get paid pretty much the same as elsewhere ~ and they don't get fired at any higher rate than in other jurisdictions.

There's a kind of a market for teachers with various talents ~ and it works despite the best efforts of the unions.

Almost like they are totally irrelevant.

Guess they are!

My thought is that the internet is now robust enough that Virginia's teachers (if not the others) could probably make good use of a job exchange and move around to higher salaries or better environments.

16 posted on 01/22/2011 5:31:15 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

First I’ve heard about this. Very good.
States should make this a priority, especially in wake of the bulging budgets.


17 posted on 01/22/2011 5:37:34 PM PST by Marty62 (Marty 60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

bookmark.


18 posted on 01/22/2011 5:46:22 PM PST by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic
Teachers unions don't negotiate contracts in Texas. since I don't support McLain-Finegold they should be free to donate whatever to whoever.
19 posted on 01/22/2011 6:42:03 PM PST by barb-tex (What else did you expect from the likes of 0? BTW, What ever happened to Rhodesia?, Oh, yes, Zimbabw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

You can’t imagine how many teachers in Alaska would rather have the state run education and would like to see the Fed Dept of ed dis-banded; along with so many other fed institutions.


20 posted on 01/22/2011 7:05:06 PM PST by Eska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson