Replies

I had second thoughts about including the description of him as “staunch republican” as he is universally acknowledged in any article, reference about him, knowing fully well that there’s going to be those who will take umbrage for including his conservative credentials in my comment. You’ve proven me right. Kindly do a search on Judge M. Roll and please let me know what you turn up. Thank You.

Yes I agree. There have been so many news articles describing the late judge as a "conservative", however his most recently noteworthy ruling (think it was 2005) was regarding the Arizona rancher whose land had been continually overrun by hordes of illegal aliens crossing the border illegally. When the rancher began to apprehend the illegals, they collectively brought suit against the rancher, most likely through the efforts of a group such as La Raza. This judge ruled in favor of the illegal aliens, and against the rightful landowner and U.S. citizen. I don't understand why he did not rule that the illegal aliens, as Mexican illegals, had no standing to file suit in a U.S. court against a U.S. citizen, since they were present in the U.S illegally and were not U.S. citizens, so therefore not entitled to a constitutional redress of grievances. Why the courts and the press continue to assume that anyone who is standing on U.S. soil is ipso facto entitled to all of the rights and privileges of U.S. citizenship just astounds me. Many questions about this case have gone unanswered.