Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

Historically, Jews were scapegoats. In the context of the shooting story, Palin was a scapegoat. “Blood libel” works quite well on multiple levels.


38 posted on 01/12/2011 11:06:26 AM PST by matt1234 (0bama's bunker phase: Nov. 2010 - Jan. 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: matt1234

Wow! Your comment just gave me an epiphany. Sarah is the scapegoat. She has been the scapegoat since she appeared on the national scene. She so shines with Christian goodness it drives the sinners crazy. so, they try to dump all of their sins on her and send her out into the wilderness in order to be forgiven for at least a short while. That explains why she is attacked about everything she does. When almost half the nation individually are projecting their individual sins onto her, there is no way she can ever be innocent in their eyes. She stirs the same reactions in people that Jesus stirred in them. Finally, it makes sense to me why she is so feared, and it scares the c..p out of me.


71 posted on 01/12/2011 12:08:53 PM PST by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: matt1234

“Historically, Jews were scapegoats. In the context of the shooting story, Palin was a scapegoat. “Blood libel” works quite well on multiple levels.”

Concur.

Personally, I am happy for people to use the phrase, as many people are unaware of that bit of history.


104 posted on 01/14/2011 7:43:31 AM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson