Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(liberal Democratic) Jewish groups respond to Palin’s use of ‘blood libel’
Yahoo ^ | 1/12/11 | Zachary Roth

Posted on 01/12/2011 10:51:31 AM PST by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: markomalley

Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, someone get them a blankie and binky


21 posted on 01/12/2011 10:58:50 AM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Alan Dershowitz just defended Palin's right to use that term:

http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/01/12/exclusive-alan-dershowitz-defends-sarah-palins-use-of-term-blood-libel/

22 posted on 01/12/2011 10:59:16 AM PST by Al B. (Sarah Palin: "Buck up or stay in the truck.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

LOL, the last thing liberal Jews are worried about is the American people DAILY, HOURLY, being accused of murder.

They don’t even care about Jews being accused of murder...for decades.

The ADL is useless.


23 posted on 01/12/2011 10:59:16 AM PST by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Sarah is a master of using words and phrases that send the left into orbit. Death panels and blood libels are only the beginning if the lefties don’t shape up and act responsibly.


24 posted on 01/12/2011 10:59:43 AM PST by JPG (YES SHE CAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

You know the left has lost when Alan Dershowitz defends Sarah Palin


25 posted on 01/12/2011 10:59:50 AM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Hey Zach...shut up.


26 posted on 01/12/2011 11:00:25 AM PST by MichaelCorleone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

They all voted for the muslim - screw them. They hate Christians anyway - biggest bigots going. They are fond of the term “schwarzers” too.


27 posted on 01/12/2011 11:00:38 AM PST by Frantzie (Slaves do not have freedom only the illusion of freedom & their cable TV to drool at)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jolla
Our dictionary is getting smaller by the day.

I seem to remember a book involving limiting and reducing the vocabulary in order to limit thought.

'Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed, will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten. Already, in the Eleventh Edition, we're not far from that point. But the process will still be continuing long after you and I are dead. Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller. Even now, of course, there's no reason or excuse for committing thoughtcrime. It's merely a question of self-discipline, reality-control. But in the end there won't be any need even for that. The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect. Newspeak is Ingsoc and Ingsoc is Newspeak,'

-1984 Part 1, Chapter 5


28 posted on 01/12/2011 11:01:35 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Washington is finally rid of the Kennedies. Free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Simple truths are a universal concept. They are not reserved for certain groups.


29 posted on 01/12/2011 11:01:47 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Oh, for crying our freakin' loud, I'm so sick of these "special interest" groups crying and wringing their hands in righteous indignation at every perceived and imaginary slight.

Hey, whiny "special interest" people...we don't care what offends you.

Suck it up.

30 posted on 01/12/2011 11:01:48 AM PST by Allegra (You're a towel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Abe Foxman is AGAINST Geert Wilders. Some of Wilders biggest supporters in the USA are conservative Jews like - Pam Yellen, Savage and Joyce Kaufman. Pam is a awesome.

Foxman is a POS.


31 posted on 01/12/2011 11:02:33 AM PST by Frantzie (Slaves do not have freedom only the illusion of freedom & their cable TV to drool at)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Hey Abraham Foxman!


Blood Libel


Blood Libel


Blood Libel


KMA Moron!
32 posted on 01/12/2011 11:02:53 AM PST by mtbrandon49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
"While the term "blood-libel" has become part of the English parlance to refer to someone being falsely accused..."

Foxman admits the term's common usage in the English language, so what's the problem here? We all know the answer -- Sarah Palin is the problem (for them). It's personal. If a lib-Dem had used the same term in reference to someone who's been falsely accused, Foxman and Co. wouldn't have said a damn thing about it.

33 posted on 01/12/2011 11:03:35 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley


34 posted on 01/12/2011 11:03:52 AM PST by Maceman (Obama -- he's as American as nasi goreng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

From Dictionary.com’s encyclopedia section:

Blood libels are sensationalized allegations that a person or group engages in human sacrifice, often accompanied by the claim that the blood of victims is used in various rituals and/or acts of cannibalism. The alleged victims are often children.

Some of the best documented cases of blood libel focus upon accusations against Jews, but many other groups have been accused throughout history, including Christians, Cathars, Carthaginians, Knights Templar, witches, Wiccans, Christian heretics, Roma, Mormons, neopagans, Native Americans, atheists and communists.

This jewish group is WRONG.


35 posted on 01/12/2011 11:04:11 AM PST by MortMan (I am in no mood to be amused! (Ebenezer Scrooge))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Abe wants a Jewish monopoly on the term, but only the right kind of Jews ~ I’m sure he’d send the Lubovitch on their way should they dare cross the line and try to snatch that term out of his mouth.


36 posted on 01/12/2011 11:05:30 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; FlashBack; athelass; Tina Grazier; acapesket; exit82; backwoods-engineer; ...
Idiots...Sarah Palin is the best friend that Jewish people and Israel have in American politics today.


37 posted on 01/12/2011 11:05:30 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Historically, Jews were scapegoats. In the context of the shooting story, Palin was a scapegoat. “Blood libel” works quite well on multiple levels.


38 posted on 01/12/2011 11:06:26 AM PST by matt1234 (0bama's bunker phase: Nov. 2010 - Jan. 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The problem here is not with the use of the term in its present context, but with the term’s historic context. Many have used this term in contemporary thought, yet out of context with its historic meaning.

Yet it’s the historic context that those who will defame Sarah Palin will cling to. Could she have used some less “charged” term? Probably. Would it have prevented further attacks? Doubtful. Those who hate her, or fear her, will find any excuse. However, the one problem I see of her use of “blood libel” is that it takes the debate away from what she said to the term itself. And that’s too bad. She was spot on.


39 posted on 01/12/2011 11:07:09 AM PST by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbrandon49

Well maybe he has a point.

Perhaps she could have made a better choice of words to describe the Tuscon Holocaust


40 posted on 01/12/2011 11:07:38 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 .....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson