Time for another round of familiar drill: Financial Times trotting out some Korea expert to oppose any and all tough measures from SK, WSJ calling for SK's "admirable restraint," Business Insider is freaking out, screaming WW III, CNN and NYT demanding SK to appease NK further, Chicom praising NK for its restraint and denouncing SK for 'emotional' response, and Obama suddenly emphasizing strategic partnership with China.
To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; nw_arizona_granny; ...
2 posted on
01/10/2011 9:23:24 PM PST by
TigerLikesRooster
(The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
To: TigerLikesRooster
To: TigerLikesRooster
headline: NK blasts SK “violent rhetoric” and says it is fanning the flames.
lol. Sounds familiar. heh.
5 posted on
01/10/2011 9:57:08 PM PST by
GeronL
(How DARE you have an opinion!!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
1978 - South Korea, South Africa, Taiwan & Israel all worked together on this type of project.
Is there a reason why China never took Taiwan, or North Korea invading the South, and was the Lybian Nuke transfer just another in a series that started with South Africa. Was there ever two nuclear explosions off the coast of South Africa in the late 70s?
6 posted on
01/11/2011 12:13:15 AM PST by
Jumper
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson