Re #5:
So let me get this straight. If a politician says something one day and says something different the next it’s okay? Or does that rule apply only to Sarah Palin?
Great question.
Please enlighten us, dear FRiend, where Gov. Palin
said something one day and something different the next.
The article says (and the source is DNC and RINOs)
“Just days after McCain picked her as his running mate, Palin told ABC News she believes human activities
“certainly can be contributing to the issue of global warming, climate change” and that “we’ve got to do
something about it, and we have to make sure that
we’re doing all we can to cut down on pollution.”
Notice Gov. Palin did NOT contradict what I posted
and what she said later. Notice she said “CAN BE
CONTRIBUTING” and not “is the cause of”. So Gov.Palin
was accurate and did not contradict herself.
So why did you say she did?
The Left and RINOS will have to learn about Sarah Palin the way they learned about the Gipper--the hard way.
Please enlighten us, dear FRiend, where Gov. Palin
said something one day and something different the next.
The article says (and the source is DNC and RINOs)
“Just days after McCain picked her as his running mate, Palin told ABC News she believes human activities
“certainly can be contributing to the issue of global warming, climate change” and that “we’ve got to do
something about it, and we have to make sure that
we’re doing all we can to cut down on pollution.”
Notice Gov. Palin did NOT contradict what I posted
and what she said later. Notice she said “CAN BE
CONTRIBUTING” and not “is the cause of”. So Gov.Palin
was accurate and did not contradict herself.
So why did you say she did?
Name one politician that hasn’t? The question is, are they having a sincere change of mind, or are the two quotes taken out of context and appear to contradict when they actually don’t, or are they just blowing with the wind to get elected.
I don’t doubt Palin’s sincerity at all, she has a history of great integrity, the others listed, well they have a long history of blowing with the wind, especially mittens.
Shhh...you’re not supposed to notice.
LOL, nailed it!!!!
LOL, nailed it!!!!
What Palin said is not enough to convict her of globalwarmingism. To do that, you’d need a lot more than a single ambiguous statement. And some policy evidence.
The purpose of this entire article is to try to discredit Palin in the eyes of conservatives by making up more lies.
Not working.
Just days after McCain picked her as his running mate, Palin told ABC News she believes human activities "certainly can be contributing to the issue of global warming, climate change" and that "we've got to do something about it, and we have to make sure that we're doing all we can to cut down on pollution." So let me get this straight. If a politician says something one day and says something different the next it’s okay? Or does that rule apply only to Sarah Palin?
Nice try.We knew the bottom line . . . was ultimately to shut down a lot of our development. And it didn’t make any sense because it was based on these global warming studies that now we’re seeing (is) a bunch of snake oil science.
It COULD be; if they then don't turn around and repeat what they said the FIRST day!
It applies only to Saint Sarah. She can flip-flop as much as she wishes.