Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: epithermal

Was this a tax credit, or just a reduction in withholdings?


4 posted on 12/16/2010 2:01:32 PM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Ramsbotham

The latter.


6 posted on 12/16/2010 2:02:32 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

IIRC, they just adjusted the tables to withhold less money, but they didn’t actually change the rates.

You’re still on the hook for that money and those taxpayers who carefully balance their deductions and tax with the goal of breaking even, they may find that they owe GOVzilla some cash.


9 posted on 12/16/2010 2:04:57 PM PST by Crolis ("To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it." -GKC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

I think this was the adjustment in with holding that would have to be paid back if taxes are due. Just a temporary holding of their own money.

We said then it would have to be paid back by some and that it would be a surprise.

Well, SURPRISE!


13 posted on 12/16/2010 2:07:40 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (Half of the population is below average)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

It was a reduction in witholding without a reduction
in rate. The paychecks were larger by virtue of not
paying what is due. It is still due. That will suck up
a bit of the income tax refund spending spree.


17 posted on 12/16/2010 2:11:40 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson