Posted on 12/15/2010 6:53:14 PM PST by lbryce
Federal prosecutors, seeking to build a case against the WikiLeaks leader Julian Assange for his role in a huge dissemination of classified government documents, are looking for evidence of any collusion in his early contacts with an Army intelligence analyst suspected of leaking the information.
Justice Department officials are trying to find out whether Mr. Assange encouraged or even helped the analyst, Pfc. Bradley Manning, to extract classified military and State Department files from a government computer system. If he did so, they believe they could charge him as a conspirator in the leak, not just as a passive recipient of the documents who then published them.
Among materials prosecutors are studying is an online chat log in which Private Manning is said to claim that he had been directly communicating with Mr. Assange using an encrypted Internet conferencing service as the soldier was downloading government files. Private Manning is also said to have claimed that Mr. Assange gave him access to a dedicated server for uploading some of them to WikiLeaks.
Adrian Lamo, an ex-hacker in whom Private Manning confided and who eventually turned him in, said Private Manning detailed those interactions in instant-message conversations with him.
He said the special servers purpose was to allow Private Mannings submissions to be bumped to the top of the queue for review. By Mr. Lamos account, Private Manning bragged about this as evidence of his status as the high-profile source for WikiLeaks.
Wired magazine has published excerpts from logs of online chats between Mr. Lamo and Private Manning. But the sections in which Private Manning is said to detail contacts with Mr. Assange are not among them. Mr. Lamo described them from memory in an interview with The Times, but he said he could not provide the full chat transcript
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
It all comes down to the lax security that allowed for a low-ranking private, mostly anyone to access this supposedly secure encyclopedic repository of classified data much too easily, conveniently.
From the numbers I have seen, they were so lax with this “secure” information that 1% of the US population had access to it. Anyone in that group could have dumped it. It is not hard to believe it was done on purpose.
It has taken Holder FAR too long on this: he was much quicker to hound Arizona on behalf of illegal Mexicans and Central Americans and to sue a small town school board for not extending leave to a Muslim teacher who wanted to visit Mecca during the school year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.