Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EDITORIAL: No sunlight on Black Panthers--Obama administration blocks transparency
The Washington Times ^ | December 13, 2010 | Editorial

Posted on 12/13/2010 5:13:16 PM PST by jazusamo

Judicial Watch is exposing the emptiness of open-government promises by President Obama and Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. These Democrats have stiffed the legal public-interest group's Freedom of Information requests related to the Justice Department's dismissal of a voter-intimidation case against members of the New Black Panther Party. Judicial Watch's Dec. 7 filings reveal the false basis for the administration's novel claims of "privilege" against disclosure.

Judicial Watch says Justice has withheld "approximately 80 documents in their entirety." The department claims many are protected by the "deliberative process privilege." That exemption from disclosure is intended to provide for what the administration calls "a more fulsome decision-making process" without fear of staffers being embarrassed by suggestions they made merely to examine all sides of an issue.

Courts long have established that this privilege applies only to memorandums that are "pre-decisional." Once a decision has been made and enacted, the deliberative process has ended. Many of the unreleased documents were created after Justice ended the Black Panther case and thus clearly were not part of the deliberative process. Judicial Watch bolsters its common-sense argument by citing the Supreme Court precedent in NLRB v. Sears (1975): "Communications made after the decision and designed to explain it are not privileged." Case closed.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: blackpanthers; corruption; doj; holder; justicedepartment; obama; racism; transparency
Obama/Holder is a corrupt tag team enterprize.
1 posted on 12/13/2010 5:13:23 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Any blind person can see what is behind this -—Racism.

If two Klansmen in robes had been at a polling place they wouldnt have had to carry clubs to get convicted and jailed,


2 posted on 12/13/2010 5:16:49 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

What?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfu1_Scgyow


3 posted on 12/13/2010 5:17:22 PM PST by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

....do you see now how the post Civil War KKK took hold?....the South was being run into the ground by crooked blacks in league with crooked carpetbaggers...and all backed by the power of a corrupt Federal administration.


4 posted on 12/13/2010 5:22:16 PM PST by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cowtowney; All

Excellent video!

Obama Lies 7 Times In Under 2 Minutes!


5 posted on 12/13/2010 5:25:27 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: STONEWALLS

Aint Reconstruction Hell?


6 posted on 12/13/2010 5:25:47 PM PST by barb-tex (What else did you expect from the likes of 0? BTW, What ever happened to Rhodesia?, Oh, yes, Zimbabw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
A Conflict Over Subpoenas in New Black Panther Case
By Ryan J. Reilly | December 10, 2009 12:57 pm
Todd Gaziano is leading the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights inquiry into the New Black Panther Party case (photo by Ryan J. Reilly / Main Justice).

Todd Gaziano is leading the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights inquiry into the New Black Panther Party case (file photo by Ryan J. Reilly / Main Justice).

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has subpoenaed the Justice Department to obtain documents related to the handling of the case against the New Black Panther Party and several members.

Documents the commission is seeking include witness statements, copies of investigations by the Justice Department, reports of suspected voter intimidation, documents on the decision to drop charges and communications among DOJ officials relating to the case.

Just one problem – it’s up to the Justice Department to enforce the subpoena from the executive branch agency. And therein lies the conflict.

The Justice Department has not decided whether to hand over the material...........more at:

http://www.mainjustice.com/2009/12/10/a-conflict-over-subpoenas-in-new-black-panther-case/


7 posted on 12/13/2010 5:31:20 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

I really hope and pray that in 2011, we see some new congress people take this up as a priority.


8 posted on 12/13/2010 5:32:54 PM PST by bareford101 (For me, there is no difference in a tolerant, open mind and a cess pool. Both are open to filth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: STONEWALLS

Amen!!


9 posted on 12/13/2010 7:02:59 PM PST by Lil Flower (American by birth. Southern by the Grace of God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson