Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP blocks Democratic effort to award seniors $250 in lieu of lack of COLA increase next year
StarTribune.com ^ | 12/8/10 | JIM ABRAMS , Associated Press

Posted on 12/08/2010 12:48:11 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo

House Republicans on Wednesday thwarted a Democratic effort to award $250 checks to Social Security recipients facing a second consecutive year without a cost-of-living increase.

President Barack Obama and Democrats have urged approval of the one-time payment, saying seniors barely getting by on their Social Security checks face undue hardships without the COLA increase.

But Republicans contended that the nation couldn't afford the estimated $14 billion cost of the payment, and that the COLA freezes in 2010 and 2011 come after seniors received a significant boost in 2009.

(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cola
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Dem President.

Dem House.

Dem Senate.

Yep, it's our fault.

1 posted on 12/08/2010 12:48:15 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

So, when are the Democrats going to offer to stop by the houses of elderly folk and do their hedges and mow their lawns...and then pay them for the privilege?


2 posted on 12/08/2010 12:50:11 PM PST by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Regime media deceit.

The lame duck democrat party totally dominates the House and could easily pass this bill.


3 posted on 12/08/2010 12:52:22 PM PST by FormerACLUmember (Character is defined by how we treat those who society says have no value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

That S.O.B. Obama takes with one hand, gives back with the other, and then boasts about how generous he is to our suffering seniors and waits for everyone to thank him for his generosity.

Sorry, but the cost of living freeze was bogus in the first place. There is obvious inflation in the essentials you need to survive—food, gas, home heating, electric bills, etc.

If he’s so damned compassionate, why did he push through that bogus s.s. freeze in the first place?


4 posted on 12/08/2010 12:54:06 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Aw, come on, guys. I’m living on SS right now and $250 isn’t going to help anyone enough to make a difference. This is just politicians trying to buy a vote or two.


5 posted on 12/08/2010 12:57:20 PM PST by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Well, even if it is a product of the GOP, good for them. The nation is broke, everyone is going to have to learn some deprivation...even seniors. If they think this is going to be carried on the backs of the working class, someone needs to give them the wake up call.


6 posted on 12/08/2010 12:57:34 PM PST by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

They didn’t take it through the normal committee process.

The democrats hate the committees, because they don’t always behave, in this case I’m sure they are afraid the committee would attach a straight-up tax cut extension, and Pelosi has been avoiding that like the plague, because she knows it will pass, and then they wouldn’t have bargaining chips to get their unemployment insurance.

So they had to bring it up under fast-track procedures. Note they have known about this for months, and had plenty of time to NOT fast-track it. fast-track was originally for emergencies, and for things that were simple and everybody agreed on. It requires 2/3rds vote (this is the House rule for skipping committees and getting on the floor calendar without scheduling).

For 2/3rds, they needed some republicans, and so it is reasonable to say that the republicans blocked the passage, since they didn’t vote for it.


7 posted on 12/08/2010 12:58:23 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Isn’t it this administration that declined to give them a COLA again??

lol


8 posted on 12/08/2010 12:58:33 PM PST by GeronL (#7 top poster at CC, friend to all, nicest guy ever, +96/-14, ignored by 1 sockpuppet.. oh & BANNED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

I understand the Conservative thinking.

BUT, CONGRESS GOT A PAY RAISE IN 2009 AND 2010 AND I BET THEY GET ONE IN 2011.

SO WHY CAN’T I HAVE MY COLA???


9 posted on 12/08/2010 12:58:48 PM PST by HighlyOpinionated (I am a US Citizen, A Patriot, A TEA Partier, An Oath Keeper, A Voter, An Auburn Fan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
If he’s so damned compassionate, why did he push through that bogus s.s. freeze in the first place?

There was no freeze pushed through. Social Security COLA increases are determined by a formula based on increases in the CPI, not voted on yearly.

10 posted on 12/08/2010 12:59:06 PM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

$250 is a lose-lose. it really is an insulting figure; not enough for the recipients to appreciate, and it accomplishes nothing other than to swell the deficit.


11 posted on 12/08/2010 1:00:18 PM PST by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Ya mean that the fraudulent Pigford black senior farmers will only get $50,000 instead of $50, 250.


12 posted on 12/08/2010 1:00:34 PM PST by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

The reason Soetoro and his fellow Communists favor sending out checks for a flat amount is:

1) It looks to the stupid seniors (the only ones who will ever vote for Soetoro and the Communists again) as though Soetoro is doing them a favor;

2) It screws over the “rich” seniors, whose COLA would have been larger than the “poor” seniors’.


13 posted on 12/08/2010 1:01:04 PM PST by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

It’s not really bogus. It’s not whether cost of living went up this year, it’s whether it is higher than it was in August of 2008, when the last CPI increase was calculated. That CPI was artificially high because gasoline was over $4.00 a gallon (it is at $3.00 a gallon now, a 25% reduction).

Until the total CPI rises above what it was in August of 2008, there will be no adjustment.

On the other hand, They got a 5.9% increase for 2009 based on the 2008 number. If they had done the CPI in November instead of September, the increase would have been much less, there’d be a small increase now, and their total SS would be about the same as it will be.

I think seniors are better off having gotten the increase 2 years ago.


14 posted on 12/08/2010 1:01:58 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bob

And, of course, the CPI is showing very little inflation.

Funny how that works out. It couldn’t be that the government is lying to us, could it?


15 posted on 12/08/2010 1:02:49 PM PST by Fresh Wind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bob
Social Security COLA increases are determined by a formula based on increases in the CPI,

And the CPI is "cooked" to hide the inflation that the COLA is supposed to offset.

16 posted on 12/08/2010 1:04:06 PM PST by thulldud (Is it "alter or abolish" time yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bob

No, they don’t vote on the COLAs, as you say. But they do fudge the CPI. It is gotten almost completely bogus. And, at the moment, the buck stops with Obama.


17 posted on 12/08/2010 1:04:43 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Exactly.....


18 posted on 12/08/2010 1:06:06 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (FreeRepublic......Monthly Donors Welcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

See 16 and 17.


19 posted on 12/08/2010 1:13:42 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
The measure was brought up under a fast-track procedure that required a two-thirds majority for passage. The 254-153 vote in favor of the bill fell short of that.

Twenty-six Republicans voted for the bill, while 141 opposed it. Democrats were in favor, 228-12.

I guess that explains the Dims' blaming this on the Republicans.

20 posted on 12/08/2010 1:15:31 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson