Posted on 11/15/2010 9:09:06 AM PST by ColdOne
Really, there is no such thing. Even contact detonation with another explosive does not cover every case.
This is just a variant of the "silver bullet solution", i.e. there is some magical solution which will solve all of the problems. This is the same fantasy as the one supporting the backscatter x-ray search. There will always be an element of risk. Even if the passengers are stripped naked, shot full of thorazine, and strapped to a cradle for transit, some jihadi could sill screw things up. For example, the lines to security are not really protected, a coordinated bombing (especially with remote controlled bombs on the would be bombers) could really have a greater impact than 9-11.
The product thing to do is to accept the risk and ruthlessly focus the mitigation on the root cause, i.e. international terrorism in the name of religion and revenge for "exploited peoples". AKA the best defense is a good offense.
The end game here is to kill off yet another American industry, this time the airlines, so Obama can take over another huge chunk of the private sector. Tastes like socialism...
Napolitano has obviously taken leave of her senses. She needs to be fired before she can spin any more stupidity into public policy.
From now on, I'm driving.
>>Really, there is no such thing. Even contact detonation with another explosive does not cover every case. <<
Awwww, come on.
Did you have to bust my dreams?!?
You’re so mean.
(thanks for the very intelligent and kind reply!)
The weapons, (box cutters), used by the 9/11 hijackers were smuggled aboard the planes via the tarmac and not by folks using the normal passenger access to aircraft.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.