Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: runninglips
So it would be several corrupt bastards making a consensus/compromise decision for a Dole like moderate (at best) in most instances.

Voter apathy in moderation is a fine thing in our Republic. Only the actually motivated (and hopefully informed and motivated) bother going to the polls. Their votes would mean less if the 17th were repealed, as their vote would only indirectly appoint a Senator, they would vote for a State Legislator who would (in back room deals) vote for a Senator.

26 posted on 11/10/2010 8:00:27 AM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

The people are represented in the House. With the Senate also elected by popular vote, we have 2 chambers focused on vote grabbing through entitlements.

With a Senate beholden to a State legislator, the Senate would be beholden to the state. Since the state governments also want power, it becomes a balance between state and federal.


45 posted on 11/10/2010 9:27:00 AM PST by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson