Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

The people are represented in the House. With the Senate also elected by popular vote, we have 2 chambers focused on vote grabbing through entitlements.

With a Senate beholden to a State legislator, the Senate would be beholden to the state. Since the state governments also want power, it becomes a balance between state and federal.


45 posted on 11/10/2010 9:27:00 AM PST by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: 5thGenTexan
Vote “grabbing” through appeal to the electorate (which includes plenty of “bringing home the bacon/pork” to their districts) is FAR FAR better than Vote “grabbing” of the vote of State Legislators only via appeal to the interests of State politicians.

The problem of the imbalance of power between the State and Federal government is mostly through an expansive reading of the interstate commerce clause.

So long as THAT is interpreted in the way it is, States have almost no power not subject to Federal oversight/regulation, and it doesn't matter one wit which way Senators were elected.

46 posted on 11/10/2010 9:42:13 AM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson