Posted on 11/07/2010 1:32:39 PM PST by Justaham
You wrote:
“Yeah, nothing ever reaches you, but at least this thread brings you out on Palin, that is something.”
Again, you resort to dishonesty. I like Palin. I have defended her and will continue to do so. What I won’t do is claim a reality show is not a reality show. I would say that this thread brings out the fact that you are dishonest, but that happens in plenty of threads in the religion forum.
For God sakes, don’t try to drag the religion forum onto this thread, or any other baggage from other threads, you have already gone into all types of personal insults. Nothing on this thread ever reaches you or penetrates your single minded obsession in pinning the title “reality TV” onto Governor Palin’s documentary show, nothing, you will not even acknowledge that the more respected, less biased parts of the media describe it as a documentary, even though we post those articles to you.
I have gone back almost a year into your posting history, and so far I see you in the column of anti-Palin as you keep hammering the left’s propaganda on this thread relentlessly, and tirelessly.
You wrote:
“For God sakes, don’t try to drag the religion forum onto this thread, or any other baggage from other threads, you have already gone into all types of personal insults.”
I just told the truth. You seem to have a problem with reality. I don’t.
“Nothing on this thread ever reaches you or penetrates your single minded obsession in pinning the title “reality TV” onto Governor Palin’s documentary show, nothing, you will not even acknowledge that the more respected, less biased parts of the media describe it as a documentary, even though we post those articles to you.”
I have no obsession (except with the truth). You are the obsessed one on this issue. Look at the lengths you will go to - desparate lengths - to make me come to accept an untruth as if it were true. You are even willing to embrace dishonesty to do it. It’s a reality show. There’s no obsession on my part in saying that. You’re obsession is fighting against the truth as it is.
“I have gone back almost a year into your posting history, and so far I see you in the column of anti-Palin as you keep hammering the left’s propaganda on this thread relentlessly, and tirelessly.”
And you say I am obsessive? I post quite a bit here at FreeRepublic. If you have gone back almost a year in my posts - just because I said a reality show is a reality show - then you are OBSESSED. You must have gone through hundreds and hundreds of posts. And so far the most damning thing you have discovered is that I said Palin was lowering herself by making a reality show - three months ago. Saying that you put me “in the column of anti-Palin” only shows your inability to think. I can call a reality show a reality show and still not be anti-Palin. I voted for her and never regretted that decision.
Quit your obsession. I posted things I posted elsehwere where I defended Palin. I doubt you have ever defended her as strongly as I did. What I didn’t do then, and won’t do now, is not be truthful or reject reality by claiming a reality show is not a reality show.
On freerepublic you attack her as you are so dedicatedly doing now, whatever you claim to do elsewhere is irrelevant.
You eagerly and determinedly choose to use and promote, the more derogatory term that is available to you, that is the reality.
I’m glad to know where you stand.
You wrote:
“On freerepublic you attack her as you are so dedicatedly doing now, whatever you claim to do elsewhere is irrelevant.”
You’re dishonest.
“You eagerly and determinedly choose to use and promote, the more derogatory term that is available to you, that is the reality.”
It’s a reality show. If you find that derogatory, I don’t care. It’s still a reality show.
“I’m glad to know where you stand.”
I like Palin. That’s where I stand and that’s where I have always stood. You stand in the gutter with dishonesty. It’s how you operate. It’s all you have. And it’s still a reality show. Lie all you like, you can’t change reality.
Oh, and one more thing: Let’s not forget which of the two of is obsessed: You are. Let’s not forget which of the two of us is dishonest: You are. I am sure you have no problem living with those qualities. You’ve demonstrated that elsewhere numerous times.
You sound as though someone tortured your puppy rather than defended Palin against your attacks, to casually slide into such personal and nasty attacks out of nowhere, is beyond bizarre.
It will be interesting to see you taking your personal attack, anti-Palin style to other threads.
You wrote:
“You sound as though someone tortured your puppy rather than defended Palin against your attacks, to casually slide into such personal and nasty attacks out of nowhere, is beyond bizarre.”
Your dishonesty seems rather easy for you to slide into. Why is that?
“It will be interesting to see you taking your personal attack, anti-Palin style to other threads.”
I have never been anti-Palin. Care to lie more?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.