[R. Scott]

… and leave the people alone.

People like the panty bomber?

[SkyPilot]

""Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Once, many years ago when I was a college student, got a weekend job doing stadium security at a Rolling Stones concert. We were asked to do "pat down" searches.

The sexual abuse I witnessed in that one night was enough to fill a crime blotter for 10 years.

[mgpilot]

TSA didn't stop the panty bomber- other passengers and the flight crew did. (You need to unpawn your own intelligence)

[ThePatriotsFlag]

… and leave the people alone. People like the panty bomber?

Well, how did that work? The "TSA" was in place and the panty bomber happened. So if they are THAT ineffective, why not have them out on the tarmac checking packages, maybe they'd find one. What good is something that "doesn't work?" (And if you say it wasn't the TSA's fault, because they weren't at the checkpoint in Europe, then your logic of using the Panty Bomber as an example is illogical, TSA had nothing to do with that one.

Best they be looking for Muslim-Middle-East young men and women and spending the time checking them THOROUGHLY. Go with the odds, what percentage of these jerks are Islamic? All of them ... so that's where the "search time" should be spent. When you go fishing, if you want to catch fish, you don't just throw a line into "any" water (swimming pools?) you throw your line in where the fish are!