[Sacajaweau]

Let’s be real....Castle had a better chance for the seat.

[Dr. Scarpetta]

Let’s be real....Castle had a better chance for the seat.

That's quite possible, but once he lost, it was time to get behind the candidate who won.

[bmwcyle]

We no longer want RINOs. I don’t care if he would have won. Let the Democrat fail. They always will. RINOs just lie their way through life. I guess you fall for lies.

[Lucius Cornelius Sulla]

‘Castle had a better chance for the seat.’

Not after he was defeated in the primary. The question is about ‘Republicans’ who continued to attack the official GOP candidate in the general election. Where I come from these folks are called ‘Democrats’.

[CitizenUSA]

Yes. Let’s be real...Castle had a better chance for the seat IF conservatives rallied behind him in the interest of party unity. The fact is, he couldn’t win his own primary. By definition, a person who cannot win their own primary is also a weak candidate. Let’s be clear...O’Donnell would have ALSO had a better chance for the seat if the RINO centrists would have rallied to her cause, too!

[MBB1984]

Sure, he did as would any liberal Republican. But, why elect a warmed over democrat?

[Lion Den Dan]

Let’s be real....Castle had a better chance for the seat.

And once Castle had the seat, you had a Rat in Pub clothing occupying it.

[hopespringseternal]

Who cares? Castle would have voted for a republican majority leader -- maybe.

Other than that, he would have voted with the democrats.