Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Labor Unions Fear Rollback of Rights if G.O.P. Wins
New York Times ^ | November 1m 2010 | Steven Greenhouse

Posted on 11/01/2010 9:33:27 AM PDT by lbryce

Organized labor is deeply worried about what happens after Tuesday.

By many measures, labor unions have been the Republicans’ fiercest, biggest-spending opponents in this year’s campaign, laying out more than $200 million in hopes of safeguarding the Democratic majorities in the House and Senate.

So it should be no surprise that Republicans, who appear to stand a good chance of winning control of the House or Senate, are signaling that they plan to push bills and strategies to undermine labor’s political clout and ability to grow.

“Republicans are likely to pursue a version of what Samuel Gompers often said: ‘Reward your friends and punish your enemies,’ ” said Joseph McCartin, a labor historian at Georgetown University.

One bill that is popular among Republicans would prohibit employers from ever agreeing to unionization through “card check,” a process often used today in which an employer recognizes a union as soon as a majority of workers sign pro-union cards — without holding a secret-ballot election. Another bill would severely crimp labor’s campaign spending by barring unions from using any portion of a union member’s dues money for political purposes unless the member first gives written permission.

A Republican-led House or Senate is expected to be more eager than a Democratic-controlled one to approve free trade agreements that unions oppose, and to be more reluctant to enact stimulus plans that unions have supported, like the recent bill that gave states $26 billion to help save the jobs of teachers, police and other government employees. A Republican-controlled House or Senate would probably block a labor-backed bill that would give firefighters and police officers in every state the right to unionize.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: democrats; organizedlabor; unions; unionscum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
......And this is a bad thing?
1 posted on 11/01/2010 9:33:31 AM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

‘Reward your friends and punish your enemies,’

Now where did I recently hear those words?


2 posted on 11/01/2010 9:34:50 AM PDT by MNDude (Ask the Native American's how their "Open Borders" policy worked out for them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

They must also fear going back to work. There are a lot of union workers that are not earning a paycheck.


3 posted on 11/01/2010 9:34:52 AM PDT by texmexis best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

MAKE THEM DEFINE THE TERMS

What “rights” are they talking about?

MAKE THEM DEFINE THE TERMS
and leftists will always lose the argument.


4 posted on 11/01/2010 9:35:57 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Enact legislation that makes all unions illegal. Anyone caught organizing one will be executed.

I know, I can dream right?


5 posted on 11/01/2010 9:36:18 AM PDT by Peter from Rutland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
They better fear for their very existence.
6 posted on 11/01/2010 9:37:00 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

The first thing that has to be done is a full scale investigation into SEIU. Their finances and intimidation tactics. Especially the pension funds.


7 posted on 11/01/2010 9:37:15 AM PDT by Marty62 (marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter from Rutland

I’m sure you were posting with your tongue firmly in your cheek, but...

no need to make unions illegal. Just as there is no need to make immoral behavior illegal.

Just repeal all laws that support union power,
give the choice back to the people,
enforce laws against intimidation and thuggery,

and unions will go bye bye all on their own.


8 posted on 11/01/2010 9:38:11 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MrB
What “rights” are they talking about?

Precisely. These aren't 'rights', they're Government enforced privileges.

9 posted on 11/01/2010 9:38:30 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
The entire point of a union is to keep people from working.

By creating barriers to entry in a given labor market, they raise their own wages by restricting supply. That's the point of monopsony. As a consequence, the public suffers through higher prices, the unemployed suffer through fewer available jobs, companies suffer from less competitiveness.

Screw the unions.
10 posted on 11/01/2010 9:38:45 AM PDT by JHBowden (Keep the Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

The union scumbags have no rights to any of our tax dollars or any other rights not defined by the Constitution. Special deals made for them can and should be rolled back.


11 posted on 11/01/2010 9:38:45 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I hope the GOP rips the funding guts out of the unions. They’ve nearly destroyed Michigan, and the fight to defund the forced unionization of day care providers here is still in court.

They are despicable. Once upon a time they served a good purpose but not anymore. Screw ‘em.


12 posted on 11/01/2010 9:38:56 AM PDT by Kieri (The Conservatrarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Public unions need to be ended yesterday. Cops included.

401K is the way.


13 posted on 11/01/2010 9:39:28 AM PDT by wac3rd (Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Unions. A boon to the working man 50 years ago
A boon to lazy rotten bastards and Union Boss Leadership nowadays.


14 posted on 11/01/2010 9:39:35 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Labor unions are monopolized labor and by definition should be illegal.


15 posted on 11/01/2010 9:40:21 AM PDT by paulcissa (The first requirement of Liberalism is to stand on your head and tell the world they're upside down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

How about rolling FORWARD the rights of people who DON’T belong to unions?


16 posted on 11/01/2010 9:40:24 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

How about rolling FORWARD the rights of people who DON’T belong to unions?


17 posted on 11/01/2010 9:40:38 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Samuel Gompers:
Gompers retained a certain sympathy for the ideas of Karl Marx throughout his life, although believing that the socialist movement had been captured by Lassallean advocates of “political party action” rather than the “militant economic program of Marx.”[15] /Wiki

He was one of socialist ‘founding fathers’ of the union movement in the US. Of course he was a British Jew.


18 posted on 11/01/2010 9:40:57 AM PDT by Doulos1 (Bitter Clinger Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Rights my @ss!

They should be dealt with a la Reagan’s confrontation with the Air Traffic Controllers!


19 posted on 11/01/2010 9:41:06 AM PDT by melancholy (It ain't Camelot, it's Scam-a-lot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Another bill would severely crimp labor’s campaign spending by barring unions from using any portion of a union member’s dues money for political purposes unless the member first gives written permission.

This should already be law.


20 posted on 11/01/2010 9:41:20 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Today, Congress. Tomorrow, the White House!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson