Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jerry Brown Reacts to Meg Whitman ‘Whore’ Slur at Debate (Video & Transcript)
Tuesday, October 12, 2010 | Kristinn

Posted on 10/12/2010 9:42:26 PM PDT by kristinn

California gubernatorial candidates Meg Whitman and Jerry Brown debated tonight at Dominican University in San Rafael. The moderator was Tom Brokaw who raised the 'whore' comment with Brown.

Video of the exchange at Bay Area NBC

Transription by Kristinn.

BROKAW: Mr. Brown you did attempt to reach out to the police union. The telephone message was left on. It's now a notorious part of this campaign. In which somebody in your campaign referred to Ms. Whitman as a "whore." A campaign spokesman then described that as "salty language" and apologized after a fashion. We've heard no outrage from you about the use of that kind of language which to many women is the same as calling an African-American the n-word. Have you been in charge of the investigation in your campaign to find out who is responsible for using that phrase?

BROWN: I don't agree with that comparison, number one. Number two, this is a five week old private conversation...

WHITMAN: Oooohh.

BROWN: ...picked up on a cellphone, uh, with a garbled transmission. Very hard to detect who it is. This is not, I don't want to get into the term and how it's used. But I will say the campaign apologized promptly and I affirm that apology tonight.

BROKAW: You're repeating it to Ms. Whitman?

BROWN: Yes I am. I do. I, it's unfortunate. I'm sorry it happened. I apologize.

WHITMAN: So Jerry, it's not just me, it's the people of California who deserve better than slurs and personal attacks. That's not what California is about. It is not our better selves. And I, um, think people know exact...I think every Californian, and especially women, know exactly what's going on here. And that is a deeply offensive term to women.

BROWN: Well, can I just interject? Have you chastised your chairman, Pete Wilson, who called Congress "whores" to the public sector unions?

WHITMAN: You know better than that Jerry. That's a completely different thing. The fact you are defending your campaign...

AUDIENCE: Heckles Whitman.

WHITMAN: The fact you are defending your campaign for a slur and, um, you know, a personal attack on me I think it's not befitting of California. It's not befitting of the office that you're running for.

BROWN: It's unfortunate. Private conversation. I'm not even sure it's legal because you have to get the consent of all the parties and there's lots of people talking so, I again, Ms. Whitman I'm sorry it happened. That does not represent anything other than things that happen in a campaign. But the issue there of course is pension reform and the fact that you got the endorsement of that union. I didn't because they said I'd be too tough on unions and public employee pensions and I'll take that.

WHITMAN: So that's actually...

AUDIENCE: Cheers Brown.

BROKAW: Admonishes audience to keep quiet.

Tape ends.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: brokaw; brown; ca2010; cadebate; jerrybrown; megwhitman; moonbeam; petewilson; tombrokaw; whitman; wilson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-162 next last
To: hsalaw
It's probably a lie on the basis that everything that comes out of the Brown campaign is a lie.

I don't think on FR we are known for basing our discussions on "probably."

There has got to be someone on here with first hand information on this question.

Does your friend actually intend to vote for that old dem hack Moonbeam,

No, absolutely not. His choice at the moment is not to vote for either of them. He is definately not a Brown fan or voter.

51 posted on 10/12/2010 10:32:41 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

There was also a point where Brown was bragging of his support by police chiefs and he said “I’ve got the police chiefs in my ...” and then he stopped and Whitman laughed and completed his sentence “He’s got the police chiefs in his pocket” Brown looked bad.


52 posted on 10/12/2010 10:35:36 PM PDT by excopconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

you are kidding me.

JERRY BROWN SIGNED THE DILL ACT IN 1978 CREATING THE SEIU ON CALIF.

HE ACTUALLY CREATED THIS UNION MESS.

DO YOU REALLY THINK YOU COULD GET AWAY WITH THIS BOLD FACED LIE POST HERE ?


53 posted on 10/12/2010 10:35:46 PM PDT by ncalburt (Even)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Re: video

She’s living in her own little world and losing ground every time she talks about this.

Time to move on.


54 posted on 10/12/2010 10:36:16 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("In politics the middle way is none at all." -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

At least he is in Congress helping out at the Federal level - he may be doing more good there than he could here. I’m a big fan of John Campbell as well. Hopefully one of the few good guys we have can build their profile enough to take a Gov. or Sen. down the road. But right now, there is a leadership gap on the right in California.


55 posted on 10/12/2010 10:36:17 PM PDT by MrShoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop
I wouldn't call Whitman's position a "sell out."

She favors keeping defined benefits, as she said, "for people who carry a gun and work to defend the people of California." The rest of the state employees would revert to a 401k type plan. Seems fair to me.

What we would offer cops is essentially the same deal we give veterans. I don't think bureaucrats deserve the same deal.

56 posted on 10/12/2010 10:36:40 PM PDT by GVnana (I'm a Mama Grizzly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

“The company did lay off about 10 percent of its workforce of about 16,000 in late 2008, but after Whitman left.”

Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2010/10/08/3088780/adwatch-brown-attack-of-whitman.html#ixzz12DIK4FmE


57 posted on 10/12/2010 10:37:09 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Sure YOUR THE EXPERT HERE.

You wanted to keep that awful comment buried just like the Obama MEDIA !!!!

Good for Meg the Media wanted that story dead.


58 posted on 10/12/2010 10:39:05 PM PDT by ncalburt (Even)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: excopconservative

That avoids the question. Did she take the bonus. Is the Brown ad true?

How am I going to go to someone that is troubled by the bonus and tell them, well, the board of directors gave it to her. The first thing out of his mouth is going to be, “She should not have accepted it.”

You are not helping me. Is the ad that is running true? If not, tell me.


59 posted on 10/12/2010 10:39:38 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep

Thank you. A straight answer. Much appreicated. FReepRegards! I’ll go to the link you provided. Thanks!


60 posted on 10/12/2010 10:41:17 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

Kind of like Fiorina who was fired after building up HP with less employees.


61 posted on 10/12/2010 10:41:38 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Release Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich and let him and his family get on with their lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

The Dill’s Act did not create the SEIU.

Google is your friend.


62 posted on 10/12/2010 10:43:38 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("In politics the middle way is none at all." -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

I see a Brown troll is back with a very unbiased comment .

You were posting Whitman was a Crook two days AGO.

Who are still trying to fool here . Brown troll
Hey how is your Rick Scott trashing campaign ??

Scott is pulling ahead so you better get astroturfing him too .


63 posted on 10/12/2010 10:43:48 PM PDT by ncalburt (Even)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

You have some principled friend there if he’s so sure he’d turn down $120M. Why am I skeptical? Maybe because talk is cheap? Not to mention it’s been noted that she was gone from eBay before the layoffs.

But by all means, stand by your principles and deal with Gov. Brown for the next four years. Just let’s not hear any complaining. He was CA gov when I lived there 30+ years ago. Wouldn’t even consider going thru it again.


64 posted on 10/12/2010 10:46:08 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom
Any suggestions on what to tell him?

No. If he doesn't understand that the layoffs probably saved a lot more jobs, he would never get it.

He doesn't sound very smart.

You might tell him that he should vote for her and give her a BIG pay cut. LOL!

65 posted on 10/12/2010 10:46:10 PM PDT by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
hey Brown troll

Here is your buddy Brown and his DILL ACT.

Goggle is not YOUR Friend . DU Troll.

http://www.foxandhoundsdaily.com/blog/joel-fox/6729-pension-bomb-explodes-jerry-brown%E2%80%99s-feet

Moveon Brown Troll !

66 posted on 10/12/2010 10:47:06 PM PDT by ncalburt (Even)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

what lie are you talking about?


67 posted on 10/12/2010 10:47:57 PM PDT by MrShoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom
I don't have to ask him that question. I already know the answer. If my bonus was $120 million and I was already very well off and I knew 10 percent of the workforce was going to be laid off, I would not take the bonus. Do you have a better answer than that? The one you offered is not going to work.

Obviously your friend is just looking for an excuse to vote for Brown. He can't actually come up with a reason to vote FOR Brown, so he's coming up with some lame reason to vote AGAINST Whitman. Does your friend even understand how business works? If she could make the company more efficient, that means more money for the shareholders. She should have got a bonus if that is what she did! Ask your friend this...would you vote for a governor that could improve the state government efficiency despite cutting the government payroll by 10%? He's a moron if he wouldn't. If he would, then obviously he should vote for Whitman.
68 posted on 10/12/2010 10:50:24 PM PDT by GLDNGUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

“He doesn’t want Brown, and he likely won’t vote for Whitman...”

So, what does he think he’ll get???


69 posted on 10/12/2010 10:51:48 PM PDT by norge (The amiable dunce is back, wearing a skirt and high heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop
http://www.foxandhoundsdaily.com/blog/joel-fox/6729-pension-bomb-explodes-jerry-brown%E2%80%99s-feet

Readi this >

Jerry Brown created the unions and their pension mess back in 1978.

Ann Coulter talked about the Jerry Brown and the DILL Act
numerous times.

Its his creation

Read it .

70 posted on 10/12/2010 10:52:31 PM PDT by ncalburt (Even)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
You have some principled friend there if he’s so sure he’d turn down $120M. Why am I skeptical?

I wouldn't take it either. I guess it is a matter of principle. Now, that is conditioned on the fact that for several years I would have been making $750,000 a year and banking it.

We have a serious problem in this country when people don't see something wrong in that bonus. It leads to candidates like Brown. I'd say if you don't want Brown (and worse), a few more pricipled people is in order.

Actions have consequences.

71 posted on 10/12/2010 10:53:59 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

The first thing out of his mouth is going to be, “She should not have accepted it.”

You are not helping me. Is the ad that is running true? If not, tell me.


Whether it’s true or not is immaterial. I’ve had a business for many years and some years I laid people off and other years I hired people. What I made in those years was not a choice between ‘Do I take the money home as profit or pay it out as wages?” The employment decisions are made based on how much work there is and whether more employees are needed to maximize profit for the business. If there are too many employees, the business does poorly and all of the employees are put at risk. That’s called management. Under your friend’s criteria, no one that has managed a business would be able to run for public office.


72 posted on 10/12/2010 10:55:28 PM PDT by excopconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN
Obviously your friend is just looking for an excuse to vote for Brown.

No, that is not true. That is a false assumption on your part.

73 posted on 10/12/2010 10:56:03 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

Nice, I see you’ve calmed down to lowercase levels. I read it, and you were still going off half cocked, what lie?


74 posted on 10/12/2010 10:56:41 PM PDT by MrShoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

Tell your friends that Brown created the Unions and their Pension mess in 1978.
http://www.foxandhoundsdaily.com/blog/joel-fox/6729-pension-bomb-explodes-jerry-brown%E2%80%99s-feet

Also inform them that Jerry has been working for years to KILL Prop 13 another GOOD thing that was created in 1978.


75 posted on 10/12/2010 10:57:03 PM PDT by ncalburt (Even)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom
No, that is not true. That is a false assumption on your part.

It's either that, or he's a bleeding heart liberal moron. I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. I still think that even if you could prove that Whitman did not take a bonus when 10% of eBay was laid off, he would simply find some other reason to not vote for her. Again, ask him ISN'T THAT EXACTLY WHAT YOU WANT THE GOVERNOR TO DO? CUT WASTE? CUT SPENDING? If you can do that in the private sector, you SHOULD get a bonus. And if you can do that in the public sector, you should elected. Period.
76 posted on 10/12/2010 11:01:24 PM PDT by GLDNGUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

Well, my gut reaction is that cops are bureaucrats and tax collectors with guns, but that isn’t really fair. Botom line for me is that I don’t want to work until I’m 70 so a cop can retire at 50 and live off a fat pension in Idaho. If a 401k is good enough for the private sector, give them to all the unions, exempting no one. The economic state of CA is disastrous and no one should get off with untouched benefits, even the police.


77 posted on 10/12/2010 11:01:36 PM PDT by MrShoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop
MAYBE you are naive.

Again, Brown is a liar and fraud and not Whitman.

You were inferring Brown was interested in solving the UNION pension mess along with the Environ wacko mess. Brown is the SEIU, Cal Nurses Union ,and all the radical union front man . They are spending millions to get him elected . He created the UNION mess back in 1978.

78 posted on 10/12/2010 11:01:57 PM PDT by ncalburt (Even)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

It’s as I suspected. I don’t know of any ceo who can
set their salary, and I don’t know of any who is paid
a $120 million salary, even with bonuses. Too many
times when one hears of a ceo making millions of dollars,
you don’t hear that part of that is based on stock options.

Options tend to come with an expiration date, and
if Whitman was quitting, then she might have had to sell
her options that had vested. The company did well when
she was ceo, seems to me she earned the profits she made
off those options.


79 posted on 10/12/2010 11:05:06 PM PDT by psjones (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt
BUMP!

DING DING DING!

Jerry Brown unionized California state workers.

80 posted on 10/12/2010 11:07:03 PM PDT by GVnana (I'm a Mama Grizzly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom
Meg Whitman took over the reins of Ebay when it was just a start up with 30 employees. At its peak with Whitman at the helm, the company had over 15,000 employees with a substantial salary and benefits cost basis.

When a Company reaches a certain level, adjustments to the Business Model must be made to stay competitive. In my role as a Manager for a Fortune 500 Bank, I had to layoff 50 people in my unit when the decision was made to outsource their positions to save the company a substantial amount of money.

After the conversion was completed and the projected cost savings were confirmed, I received a year end bonus based on a percentage of the savings. Should I give that back?

When you are accountable to Stockholders, these things are always being reviewed and implemented if the financial impact is favorable to the bottom line.

The fact that Whitman received additional compensation as CEO is just a straw man Liberal argument. Are they implying that a Governor Whitman should not be able to trim the ranks of State Employees currently performing unproductive or duplicate tasks to save the Taxpayers money?

Meg was compensated by a Board of Directors that decided that her leadership and cost control measures increased Shareholder Value while maintaining a sound Business Model.
Meg did not give herself anything, she was compensated for meeting her Contracted Goals.

The Rats are using the same tactics against Fiorina. If Fiorina had not outsourced jobs overseas at the time, HP as a Company would not be in existence today. Shortsighted Liberalism does not meet the smell test, so don't fall into the us against them trap of class warfare.

81 posted on 10/12/2010 11:10:43 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (My Rights are God given, not Obama approved...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt
I wasn't , or implying anything at all about Brown. I didn't even mention his name. I just pointed out the fact the Whitman flipped her position on pension reform, or sold her position, to a union for an endorsement. That doesn't say a lot for her sticking to her principles when the going gets really tough, which it will if she gets elected and has to fix this mess.
82 posted on 10/12/2010 11:10:58 PM PDT by MrShoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

The way I view it, I agree with the free market system. But when I see a very conservative friend telling me he is troubled by the bonus, it tells me something.

With the kind of disparity in wealth that is happening in this country, the free market system is going to crumble. I understand that company owners sacrafice and create jobs. I believe all that. I believe in the rewards that come from risk and delayed gratification.

But I see trouble coming for this country and it is going to come from a lot of people that are in very tough financial times that see a $120 million bonus as a problem.

We have a consumer finacial revolution going on in this country already. People are saying to themselves, if that is the way the game is played, screw the banks I’m walking away from my debt.

This friend of mine had a credit card and made the payments on time, never once late. They raised his rate from 3% to 18%. He said, “I was a good customer, responsible, paid on time, carried a balance and this is my reward.” He said forget it.

I’m way off subject maybe and maybe not making myself clear. The system as it is being run can’t sustain itself politically. It will take more now than what made it all work before. People thinking of taking $120 million bonuses need to control themselves. They are going to lead us into more than just a consumer financial revolution.


83 posted on 10/12/2010 11:12:28 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: GVnana
I heard Ann Coulter go off on this topic weeks ago..

Its interesting to watch the DU trolls who trash Meg daily here disappear ONCE I bring out the facts about Moonbeam. Moonbeam is the MOTHER of the CA UNION/ PENSION CHAOS and he has the NERVE to state he will want to fix it.

We can't afford his FIX !

84 posted on 10/12/2010 11:13:16 PM PDT by ncalburt (Even)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

I AGREE.

Its a HUGE Mess .

Brown is a bag man for the unions.

The SEIU, ACORN, CNA, and the rest are out in full force here peddling his LIES and SMEARS.

They are getting ugly.


85 posted on 10/12/2010 11:16:05 PM PDT by ncalburt (Even)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

Glad we agree on that! Don’t let your conservative friends not vote for Whitman or Fiorina - the alternatives are too awful.


86 posted on 10/12/2010 11:18:45 PM PDT by MrShoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom
A CEO’s salary and bonus are based on predetermined contracts with goals and incentives and a board of directors has to okay the transaction. Whitman did own Ebay, a huge SF Lefty owns it. Meg is sharp person and paid based on her contract .

Ask your friend if they mind that MOONBeam has been cashing in on TWO STATE Pensions (our tax dollars)while he and his GAP Millionairess wife live in a multi million home in the Bay area???

87 posted on 10/12/2010 11:22:40 PM PDT by ncalburt (Even)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

I hear ya.


88 posted on 10/12/2010 11:23:53 PM PDT by ncalburt (Even)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

Sorry , I missed a word “ Meg does NOT own Ebay “ .
This huge SF lefty owns it.
But he became a billionaire thanks to her.


89 posted on 10/12/2010 11:26:22 PM PDT by ncalburt (Even)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt
I see a Brown troll is back with a very unbiased comment .

I'm certainly not a Brown troll. As to my comment, it's called discussion, something that seems to evade you.

You were posting Whitman was a Crook two days AGO. You were posting Whitman was a Crook two days AGO. Who are still trying to fool here . Brown troll Hey how is your Rick Scott trashing campaign ?? Scott is pulling ahead so you better get astroturfing him too .

I said no such thing about Whitman. And I never trashed Rick Scott, either.
Take your silly lies and go play in your sandbox.

90 posted on 10/12/2010 11:30:31 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("In politics the middle way is none at all." -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

If you think that says that the Dill’s act created the SEIU, I don’t know what to tell ya.

A remedial reading comprehension class would certainly be a good start.

Quit your lying and namecalling.


91 posted on 10/12/2010 11:33:39 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("In politics the middle way is none at all." -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: mimaw

It’s not a “hole”.

The liberal propaganda machine did a good job of “getting liberal meat in the seats”.

Obummer and his minions do a good job filtering the audiences at his speeches/photo ops.

This kind of tactic is all the liberals have left. Lies, nothing more.


92 posted on 10/12/2010 11:34:22 PM PDT by Aurorales (I will not be ridiculed into silence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: psjones

I don’t think that she was forced to sell, but maybe she chose to sell some.
With a huge portion of her wealth in eBay stock, that would be an appropriate thing to do.

I figured that she chose to cash in $120 million worth of options — which is a far cry from “paying oneself.”

The other half of the allegations in the ad, regarding spinning IPO shares, was indeed true.


93 posted on 10/12/2010 11:47:32 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("In politics the middle way is none at all." -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt
Dude!

I brought up the union pension thing to YOU. Weeks ago.

Sheesh, you have a short memory!

But SEIU's creation was not from the Dill's Act and much of SEIU's growth is independent of Government.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2600338/posts?page=85#85

(snip) Jerry Brown's biggest fault was the people he hired and appointed to important posts and his role in the unionization of public employees. Hey Meg -- what about Rose Bird? And others. I haven't heard a peep about this from pubbies or the media. Campaigns are no longer about educating voters on issues and candidate positions....

94 posted on 10/12/2010 11:56:58 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("In politics the middle way is none at all." -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt
he has the NERVE to state he will want to fix it. We can't afford his FIX !

You obviously didn't listen to either of the last two debates.

95 posted on 10/12/2010 11:57:55 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("In politics the middle way is none at all." -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

I hope Gov. Moonbeam doesn’t get to hold that office again. Judging by the audience reaction, most California voters can’t differentiate between calling a woman a whore and calling Congress a whore. Californians deserve every iota of pain they have brought upon themselves. I’ll be damned if I’ll sit still and see my tax dollars bail their lame asses out of the jamb they’re in.


96 posted on 10/13/2010 12:04:02 AM PDT by skookum55 (Born American with the guarantee of a republic; destined to die a dhimmi on Obama's path to sharia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt
Sorry , I missed a word “ Meg does NOT own Ebay “ . This huge SF lefty owns it.

eBay is a publicly traded company, owned by its shareholders.

Institutional investment funds and mutual funds hold the largest number of shares (over 500M shares)

Pierre Omidyar owns about 145M shares, Whitman owns about 20M shares, etc.

97 posted on 10/13/2010 12:09:14 AM PDT by calcowgirl ("In politics the middle way is none at all." -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom; 1035rep

“FReepRegards”

That’s an interesting thing to say from a relative n00b.

1035rep’s link proved you wrong, too.

“No matter what accounting method one uses, however, it is wrong to say Whitman “paid herself” any of those amounts. Her compensation was approved by eBay’s governing board.”

I don’t think you are as ill educated as your posts would lead us to believe.


98 posted on 10/13/2010 12:25:55 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (Remember November...I can see it from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll; kristinn
Sounds like there were a lot of Brown supporters in the audience.

Oh, gee, how'd that happen? With the "whore" comment on nightly news and all? </s>

99 posted on 10/13/2010 12:57:51 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom; GLDNGUN; lonestar
He said he finds the $120 million bonus Whitman took at the time of layoffs troubling. He said he would not himself take the bonus and that he considers it "very troubling."

How about this logic?

If eBay is straitened enough by bad economic conditions, so much so that 10% of staff have to be let go, then how does the comp committee justify throwing millions at a CEO whose performance, had it been better, might have obviated the need for layoffs by adding value to the top line?

Tough times = no bonuses for anybody, or tokens at best for high performers. And $120 mil doesn't qualify as a "token". How's about that?

As a shareholder, I want my comp committee to show some sense of nod to reality.

100 posted on 10/13/2010 1:08:46 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson