Posted on 10/12/2010 12:10:52 PM PDT by roses of sharon
From the Courthouse News Service, a federal district judge has rejected a motion to dismiss the suit brought by the Obama Justice Department against the state of Arizona:
PHOENIX (CN) – A federal judge rejected motions in which Gov. Jan Brewer, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu sought dismissal of a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Arizona’s new immigration law.
The complaint filed by civil rights groups, including Friendly House and the American Civil Liberties Union, contains sufficient allegations that S.B. 1070 perceptibly impairs the ability of the organizational plaintiffs to provide the services that the organizations were formed to provide, and as a result, there can be no question that the organizations have suffered an injury in fact, U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton ruled.
“While Governor Brewer correctly points out that, for the most part, the organizational plaintiffs’ allegations involve threats of future harm, the threat of future harm is sufficiently imminent.”
Bolton found the civil rights groups have standing to bring the lawsuit because the “alleged harm to the organizational plaintiffs will occur if S.B. 1070 goes into effect, regardless of how it is enforced or applied.”
Bolton wrote that “race, alienage, or national origin discrimination was a motivating factor in the enactment of S.B. 1070.”
And this is where we hang the future of our Republic?
Okay, who appointed this one? I wonder if Fed judges remember who hires the Fed?
If at first you don't Secede, try again...
2. Civil rights groups have standing to sue and there is imminent future harm from a bill that explicitly forbids the activity that would produce the it.
Wow.
If at first you don’t Secede, try again...
************************************************
Ha! That’s funny...Mike Church sells those tee-shirts, I’m going to be giving them at Christmas time :P
Pathetic. Elsewhere in Bizarro-land, the Ft. Hood shooter trial gets yet another delay - until Nov. 9th!
So, the decision is based on some judge's personal assumption, not an interpretation of the Constitution.
When this nation finally falls, activist judges will bear a very large part of the blame.
So, in reality, “standing” is something used by activist judges to allow suits they agree with to go forward, and to deny it to suits they disagree with. I fail to see how the ACLU has any standing in this case.
Racketeers.
“S.B. 1070 perceptibly impairs the ability of the organizational plaintiffs to provide the services that the organizations were formed to provide, and as a result, there can be no question that the organizations have suffered an injury in fact, U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton ruled.”
Hey, Susie-Q, take a Midol, then get back in the kitchen and rattle those pots and pans, you low-grade moron.
If the “services that the organizations were formed to provide” are illegal, dungwit, then we shouldn’t just be interfering, we should be shutting them down and jailing them.
“So, in reality, “standing” is something used by activist judges to allow suits they agree with to go forward, and to deny it to suits they disagree with.”
How is that different from the practices of leftards in every context and circumstance? That’s why there is no point in listening to them.
The DREADED SCOTTSDALE DECISION.....................
Well thats one more step closer to civil war.
The judge is Susan Bolton...the same one that issued the injunction. It’s not a surprise she would reject this routine request for dismissal, considering how she’s already ruled on this case.
Can we impeach?
I am totally fed up with the assault on our rights and our country. We have to do whatever it takes to take our county back from these true, true, true traitors.
If we formed a National Association for the Advancement of Conservatives in General [NAACG] we would have standing to sue Soetero and Company for trying to eliminate our constituency?
Ping!
PS: If you do this I will move there and join the Arizona Army(Like that sound)
That terrorist gets a trial delay? FGS why?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.