Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Kagan Qualified? Duh, of course not. This proves it.
Washingtonpost.com ^ | 10-4-10 | Robert Barnes

Posted on 10/04/2010 10:54:21 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich

Elena Kagan begins hearing cases as the Supreme Court's 112th justice Monday morning. But anyone who wants to see her in action needs to be sharp. This Story

* Supreme Court justices kick off session with traditional Red Mass * The High Court: Kagan's recusals take her out of action in many of the Supreme Court's cases * Elena Kagan is formally sworn in as a Supreme Court Justice * Poll: Do you agree with Kagan's nomination?

View All Items in This Story View Only Top Items in This Story This Story

* Supreme Court opens term with three women, potential for partisan divide * The High Court: Kagan's recusals take her out of action in many of the Supreme Court's cases * Take the Supreme Court seating challenge * Supreme Court docket: Free-speech rights, violent video games, immigration law * Kagan formally sworn in as Supreme Court justice * Elena Kagan is formally sworn in as a Supreme Court Justice

View All Items in This Story View Only Top Items in This Story

Kagan will hear the first case argued before the court, then slip quietly through the burgundy velvet curtains behind the bench. She'll be out of the action in all three cases : Tuesday. Her chair will be empty when the court returns next Tuesday and she'll put in a half-day the next day.

Kagan's old job as solicitor general - the "10th justice" - is initially making it hard to do her new job as the ninth justice.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: kagan; obama; scotus
Taking a page from her hero Obama's work ethic, there's just so much work and the caseload is intense. So many conflicts and the solicitor general's job, too.

Cry me a river. She isn't qualified and we should be praying to protect America from her and her votes.

1 posted on 10/04/2010 10:54:23 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

If only she could be recused all the way to retirement.


2 posted on 10/04/2010 10:57:42 AM PDT by WAW (Which enumerated power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

Recusing herself from anything to do with a legal analysis is the thing to do.

She’s got about as much talent in that field as she would in physics.

She’s a bimbo.

Period.


3 posted on 10/04/2010 11:04:40 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WAW

Is this a bad?


4 posted on 10/04/2010 11:05:13 AM PDT by forgotten man (forgotten man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

Considering she has forty years on the court, one year really won’t matter in the big scheme of things...../sarc.


5 posted on 10/04/2010 11:05:51 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich
Taking a page from her hero Obama's work ethic, there's just so much work and the caseload is intense. So many conflicts and the solicitor general's job, too.

When judges move from the Department of Justice to a court, the rules of judicial ethics require them to recuse (disqualify) themself in any case they worked on as a government lawyer. Rehnquist was recused from many cases during his first term on the Court, for the same reason. By next term, this won't be an issue.

There are many things to criticize Kagan for, but this isn't one of them; she is following the law.

6 posted on 10/04/2010 11:51:24 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
"She's (Kagan) a bimbo."

Bimbo

Kagan

Any Questions?

7 posted on 10/04/2010 11:54:22 AM PDT by Aunt Polgara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

Voting “present” and then leaving...


8 posted on 10/04/2010 11:55:46 AM PDT by Bookwoman ("...and I am unanimous in this...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

We should be happy that she is forced to recuse herself from many cases this term. We knew we were going to get a leftist, but at least she can’t do as much harm as someone who wouldn’t have to recuse themselves. In a close case, it could be the difference between winning it and losing it even if Kennedy votes with the socialists.


9 posted on 10/04/2010 11:57:40 AM PDT by Aunt Polgara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Can anyone possibly believe that George Bush would have been able to get a nominee to the bench who would have to recuse themselves repeatedly because of “bias” for arguing for Bush’s viewpoint on numerous cases?

But I’m told there is no bias in the media


10 posted on 10/04/2010 11:57:51 AM PDT by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich
Well, someone figured out why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court.... Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard.

Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket: You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?? Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!!! Check out these examples:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/08-10382.htm

11 posted on 10/04/2010 12:00:04 PM PDT by True Grit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

will she also recuse herself from DADT? marriage protection?


12 posted on 10/04/2010 12:07:52 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich
With regard to Kagan's recusing herself:

Lefty Senator Patrick Leahy is trying to “remedy” this “problem”, according to an editorial in the WSJ today.

Leahy is apparently going to propose legislation - as if Congress can “legislate” SCOTUS appointments - that would place a retired SCOTUS justice temporarily back on the bench to participate in a case where a sitting justice recused themselves.

Of course the conniving Leahy is explaining his proposal as the "benevolent" motive of seeking to avoid 4-4 tie votes.

Yea right!!!.

13 posted on 10/04/2010 1:31:00 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


14 posted on 10/04/2010 3:22:19 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
She’s a bimbo.

She's a lesbo. There is a difference.

15 posted on 10/05/2010 3:08:36 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson