Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

“I heard, by reputation, she was some environmental wacko, but I didn’t find that at all,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who pulled the plug on bipartisan talks over the summer.

Don't bet on it, she's an enviro nazi and Graham isn't much better, they both need to leave Washington.

1 posted on 09/26/2010 4:30:56 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jazusamo

After her years as a Clintonista, she had no business being invited back to Washington. Browner is an enviromentalist wacko.


2 posted on 09/26/2010 4:40:16 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Don't listen to what they say, watch what they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Sen. Lindsey Graham is a pussy. And an Obozo suckup. He must be compromised by someone on the left.

Graham must go when he is up for re-election.


3 posted on 09/26/2010 4:41:47 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
She proposed the most sweeping air pollution regulations in her agency’s history, cannily using authority that bypassed the GOP-controlled Congress.

Philip Dru, the Administrator; she's been there and done it; Obama will use her,she's not leaving the White House.

4 posted on 09/26/2010 4:43:22 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Graham is a brain dead a-hole. Browner is an invasive pest destroying the real natural environment(human freedom) and needs to be exterminated, like any other destructive alien species.
5 posted on 09/26/2010 4:45:08 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
bttt

"..Environmentalism needs to be absolutely based in objective and verifiable science, it needs to be rational, and it needs to be flexible... How will we manage to get environmentalism out of the clutches of religion, and back to a scientific discipline? There's a simple answer: we must institute far more stringent requirements for what constitutes knowledge in the environmental realm. I am thoroughly sick of politicized so-called facts that simply aren't true. It isn't that these "facts" are exaggerations of an underlying truth. Nor is it that certain organizations are spinning their case to present it in the strongest way. Not at all---what more and more groups are doing is putting out is lies, pure and simple. Falsehoods that they know to be false...At this moment, the EPA is hopelessly politicized. In the wake of Carol Browner, it is probably better to shut it down and start over. ...We need an organization that will be ruthless about acquiring verifiable results, that will fund identical research projects to more than one group, and that will make everybody in this field get honest fast." ~ Michael Crichton, September 15, 2003 Environmentalism as Religion

6 posted on 09/26/2010 5:06:04 PM PDT by Matchett-PI (The 'RAT Party - Home of our most envious, hypocritical, and greedy citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson