Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawyers argue R-J stories on Web aren’t protected by copyright
Las Vegas Sun ^ | Saturday, Sept. 25, 2010 | 2:05 a.m. | By Steve Green

Posted on 09/25/2010 9:16:08 AM PDT by redreno

By allowing people to read its stories online for free, the Las Vegas Review-Journal is essentially giving away those stories, and recipients of the articles are free to display them on their own websites.

At least that’s the theory suggested by one of the latest group of lawyers to sign on to represent one of the website operators being sued for copyright infringement by the Review-Journal’s copyright enforcement partner, Righthaven LLC.

(Excerpt) Read more at lasvegassun.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: breakingnews; nevada; righthaven

1 posted on 09/25/2010 9:16:10 AM PDT by redreno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: redreno

I basically agree that, partly due tot he nature of the web, if you place information which can be freely viewed on the web then you should expect people to save copies of it to their hard drives, and possibly share it for free, content unchanged (or with comments placed in brackets). The main stipulation would be that the source must be accredited, and should not be used to make money without the owner’s permission.


2 posted on 09/25/2010 10:13:21 AM PDT by daniel1212 ( ("Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out," Acts 3:19))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redreno

Since you have class action suits is it possible to have something similar to this for the defendants? That way all the hoards of people being sued could band together and fight this transparent shake-down attempt by this rouge law firm.


3 posted on 09/25/2010 12:13:33 PM PDT by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redreno
Stupid argument, IMHO. Published works are covered by copyright. If they weren't, entire books could be copied, sold with impunity, and the original authors would have no recourse.

I think that a far better tactic would be to go with the "fair use" exemption.

4 posted on 09/25/2010 12:21:48 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson