To: Lakeshark
Christie is NOT as conservative as this action would suggest. I’m pretty sure that the reason for the veto had more to do with belt tightening than the abortion issue. Nonetheless nobody can make the claim that Christie does not “walk the walk”. He’s gutsy as hell. NJ is lucky to have him.
To: Artemis Webb
>>Christie is NOT as conservative as this action would suggest. I’m pretty sure that the reason for the veto had more to do with belt tightening than the abortion issue.<<
Could be but I’m not sure I care at all.
God works in mysterious ways.
22 posted on
09/23/2010 7:25:38 AM PDT by
netmilsmom
(I am inyenzi on the Religion Forum)
To: Artemis Webb
I’m pretty sure that the reason for the veto had more to do with belt tightening than the abortion issue. Christie is quite openly pro-life.
To: Artemis Webb
I’d trade him for our gov any time, plus the republican squish who looks like he will win this year.
33 posted on
09/23/2010 7:31:31 AM PDT by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: Artemis Webb
I just tell people that Christie is PERFECT for New Jersey and that he is the definitive TEA party politician, and leave it at that.
37 posted on
09/23/2010 7:33:44 AM PDT by
kidd
To: Artemis Webb
Maybe Christie isn’t Jesse Helms, but he *is* pro-life. I’m sure he enjoyed this veto more than most.
47 posted on
09/23/2010 7:40:13 AM PDT by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
To: Artemis Webb
You nailed it to a tee....
To: Artemis Webb
Christie is NOT as conservative as this action would suggest. I’m pretty sure that the reason for the veto had more to do with belt tightening than the abortion issue. In terms of cutting spending on things that government should not be funding at all with tax dollars in the first place, this action is a conservative action. "Conservative" actually has much more to do with limiting size, scope, and power of government than it has to do with the abortion issue.
60 posted on
09/23/2010 7:55:36 AM PDT by
VRWCmember
(Jesus called us to be Salt and Light, not Vinegar and Water.)
To: Artemis Webb
I’m pretty sure that the reason for the veto had more to do with belt tightening than the abortion issue.
For Christie, yes. For the state republicans that changed their minds on the vote, who knows...
93 posted on
09/23/2010 9:18:55 AM PDT by
ConservativeWarrior
(In last year's nests, there are no birds this year.)
To: Artemis Webb
In this case, his fiscal conservatism ultimately supports social conservatism, whatever his view of abortion is. Praise be to God!
112 posted on
09/23/2010 10:39:20 AM PDT by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: Artemis Webb; All
Cutting government and government spending is conservative.
Standing up to the socialists/democrats, their media, their genocidal programs, their big government makes Christie a hero.
No Christie is more than a hero he is a Republican.
153 posted on
09/24/2010 5:34:35 AM PDT by
Democrat_media
(Why is no government creating a product we can hold in our hands like a cell phone..?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson