No, Mr president

No, Mr president. We don’t agree to the replacement of the Legislative branch of government with unelected, unknown “czars” whose interests are in direct opposition to the freedom and liberty of the American citizen.

No, Mr president. We don’t agree to use of the Judicial branch of government as a legislative body on its own to create law and nudge us into the corral of a tyrannical government.

No, Mr president. We don’t like for our government take over private industries, demonize American citizens and groups, and apply the law unequally.

No, Mr president. We don’t agree to being judged by some international tribunal. We always have and always will deal with our own problems and our own short-comings. We believe powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

No, Mr president. We don’t agree to turning our medical decisions over to some hazy bureaucratic panel miles away from our home and our doctor who know us only by some statistical number.

No, Mr president. We don’t agree to financing the murder of innocent babies before they even have a chance to live.

No, Mr president. We don’t agree to more redistribution of wealth. Those of us who work, work hard for ourselves, for our families, for the good of the economy, and for the satisfaction that comes from doing a job and doing it well. We don’t believe the benefits of our hard work should be given to others who think it is not necessary to work at all.

No, Mr president. We don’t agree to setting aside our belief in God. His word is the basis of everything this country stands for and believes. His precepts are the basis of our democratic republic, as wisely woven into the fabric of our system of government by the founding fathers.

No, Mr president. We don’t agree to breaking down our language, culture, morals, and civil society to the level of acceptable degeneracy. We are better than that.

No, Mr president. We don’t agree to another stimulus. Previous stimulus bailouts have failed. We don’t know how much of our money is being spent wisely and how much of it is being mis-used.

No, Mr president. We don’t trust you or your administration. Your agenda is foreign to the basic principles of this great country.

I've been saying all along IF the Republitards could ever find their gonads (ladies exempted as it appears they--Palin, Bachman, Jan Brewer, et al, --are the only ones who act as if they have a pair) and took the fight to the Demo-Rats as opposed to sitting back like a bunch of wusses, and turning the other cheek as they keep getting pumeled, they have the perfect platform and could use many of your arguments.

The Far Left, corrupt and biased media along with Rat-supporters keep saying the R's are the party of "No" and I say simply turn it around and admit same but change the spelling to "KNOW!"

"Yes we opposed death care because we "KNOW"......

"We don't believe cap and tax would benefit the American public because we "KNOW".......

"We we not in favor of Dear Leader's Porkuls bill because we "KNOW".......

and on and on and on!

Never having been in politics, but with 40+ years experience in Sales/PR/Marketing, I can't help but think this would work?

Comments???????

I agree, and I understand you anger and frustration. There's only one problem, that being that such sentiments are about thirty years to late to make a difference without an awful lot of pain between here and turning things around.

unelected, unknown “czars”

Electing democrats has made it impossible for the House or the Senate to do anything about those czars

Do you want a list of them? Each one is proof that democrats don't represent those who elect them, ever.

the Judicial branch of government

Regularly electing democrats has put the judicial branch firmly in the hands of those as radical as the most radical elected democrats. That took over twenty years of work by the democrats.

for our government take over private industries

Laughing at those who warned that the Federal government was stacking the labor laws, environmental laws, trade laws, and tax laws, decks against manufacturing in the US was bound to drive the auto industry bankrupt sooner or later. But people kept electing "good" democrats and ignored the fact that those "good" democrats always voted with the radicals on important issues. That behavior has led to the Federal government reorganizing two of the "Big Three" to suit itself (the way Krupp and Messherschmit were reorganized to suit) and left only Ford trying to swim against the tide. That's another thing that took thirty years of hard work on the part of the democrats people kept electing so don't buy GM or Chrysler products and deal with it.

to being judged by some international tribunal

If the Executive branch issues the edict to obey a treaty that hasn't yet been ratified, where is the downside for the Chief Executive? Not only does Congress lack the guts to confront the Executive, but the American people don't think such minor stuff is reason for sanctions or impeachment against a sitting president. It's "just politics" when someone in Congress is silly enough to bring up the Constitution.

I could go on, but the root cause of each point you enumerate is the same, the democrat party and a public that rather than destroying such a party, regularly elects members of that party. Proof positive that the electorate has ceased to consider itself to be citizens who must make informed decisions about their own nation.

The democrat party is now and always has been the party of slavery, sedition, secession, civil war, KKK terrorism, Jim Crow laws, eugenics laws, antisemitic immigration restrictions in response to Nazi Nuremberg laws, Stalin worshipers, the welfare plantation system, voter fraud, voter intimidation, and the eugenics driven mass murder of minority infants. The democrat party and its' educational tentacles has to be so thoroughly destroyed as a national political party that it is no longer a factor in national politics. Refusing to support less than pure Republican alternatives over a pet peeve, sitting out elections, or anything else that keeps you or influences others to not help us rid ourselves of these parasites while we are forced to continue drinking democrat arsenic, is either fifth column democrat propaganda or agreement that we should commit national suicide.

The party of “KNOW” is a great idea. Hope it will catch on. PR/Marketing is a big factor in politics - which is why we have what we have in the White House.

I believe the gonads are coming from the increasingly irate American citizen. We need someone to stand out, not necessarily as a leader of Conservatives, but as one of us who has real leadership qualities. Anyone who touts themselves as a Conservative leader (i.e. John McCain) is not the right person.

I’m a big believer in Sarah Palin, but others also are out there - John Bolton, for one.

I went to the “Restoring Honor” rally on 8/28, and it has left a lasting impression of (without sounding too Beckish) faith, hope, and charity.

Your post is priceless and needs to be circulated throughout all the conservative blogs to provide courage to others to speak out in the concise manner you have utilized.

We must elect representatives who will stand up to the concentration of coercive power in the hands of unscrupulous people in Washington, and the people need to speak out, as you have.

In the words of Thomas Jefferson:

"The true theory of our Constitution is surely the wisest and best .... When all government ... shall be drawn to Washington as the centre of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another, and wilt become as ... oppressive as the government from which we separated."
"What has destroyed the liberty and the rights of man in every government which has ever existed under the sun? The generalizing and concentrating all cares and powers into one body .... The way to have good and safe government is not to trust it all to one, but to divide it among the many ... It is by dividing and sub-dividing these republics, from the great national one down ... that all will be done for the best."

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.