hey yo, terrorist contributor = terrorist supporter. =.=
"I can guess what you racists, crackers, and birthers were all thinking."
U.S. Files Discrimination Lawsuits On Behalf Of Muslims
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2582188/posts
.... the investor says the contribution was made because he thought he was giving money to a harmless charity.
_________________________________________
BS. All these “harmless charities” are are fronts for Hamas and al-quaida type groups.
Whatcha wanna bet the FBI has known this for months now.
Yet another reason why we can not trust our gubmint.
do I really have to say it???
in Islam, the practice of concealing one’s belief and foregoing ordinary religious duties when under threat of death or injury. Derived from the Arabic word waqa (“to shield oneself”), taqiyyah defies easy translation. English renderings such as “precautionary dissimulation” or “prudent fear” partly convey the term’s meaning of self-protection in the face of danger to oneself or, by extension and depending upon the circumstances, to one’s fellow Muslims. Thus, taqiyyah may be used for either the protection of an individual or the protection of a community. Moreover, it is not used or even interpreted in the same way by every sect of Islam. Taqiyyah has been employed by the Shīʿites, the largest minority sect of Islam, because of their historical persecution and political defeats not only by non-Muslims but also at the hands of the majority Sunni sect. Scriptural authority for taqiyyah is derived from two statements in the Qurʾān, the holy book of Islam. The 28th verse of the third sura (chapter) says that, out of fear of Allāh (God), believers should not show preference in friendship to unbelievers “unless to safeguard yourselves against them.” The ninth sura was revealed (according to tradition) to ease the conscience of ʿAmmār ibn Yāsir, a devout follower of the Prophet Muhammad who renounced his faith under torture and threat of death. Verse 106 of this sura proclaims that if a Muslim who is forced to deny his religion is nevertheless a true believer who feels “the peace of faith” in his heart, he will not suffer great punishment (16:106). The meaning of these verses is not clear even in the context of the sura in which they appear. Thus, even among Islamic scholars who agree that the verses provide Qurʾānic sanction for taqiyyah, there is considerable disagreement about how the verses do this and about what taqiyyah permits in practice.
Raise your hand if you’re surprised........
They’re in Wall Street - they give millions to their “charities” - they give millions to jihad - Joy Brighton is a former Wall Street trader who has done a few videos on Sharia Compliant Finance.
http://islammonitor.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2670&Itemid=96
http://fsmarchives.org/article.php?id=1385377
There’s a few banks in Michigan who already adhere to Sharia (bastards). They no longer celebrate Christmas nor have parties with alcohol. Universal Bank is one, another Devon...
and if bullsh*t was snow, we'd be in for a blizzard!
Well, the mosque's Imam doesn't consider Hamas to be a terrorist organization, so we're all cool.
Mayor Bloomberg gives his thanks and says that he will look into this troubling development. /s
WTF!!!
Interesting thought process.
1) Do I want to donate to a “harmless” charity?
or...
2) Do I want to donate to a charity that causes harm?
You be the judge.
There already was a Ground Zero mosque in Jersey City which was used by the one eyed imam to help launch the first attack on the World Trade Center. This must be brought up. History repeats itself unless we take steps not to let it.
p.s. Liberal journalists only dig deep when they need to get dirt on someone to shut them up - Sarah P, Joe the Plumber......
p.s. Liberal journalists only dig deep when they need to get dirt on someone to shut them up - Sarah P, Joe the Plumber......
Bloomberg Backs Israeli Strikes Against Hamas
From August 2010...
Bloomberg's Plea to Build Ground Zero Mosque Related to Bloomberg Business Hub in Dubai?
You mean all those articles written by all those liberals saying that we are all a bunch of racists for opposing the ground zero hamasque... you mean they were all wrong?
Is this freedom of religion or is it freedom to oppress through religion?
