Cherrypicked gibberish.
How does comparing one FEMALE subgroup to one MALE subgroup make any meaningful point? It’s apples and oranges, plus the focus is too narrow. Perhaps deliberately so.
No useful conclusions can be derived without looking at a wider spectrum of demographic and cultural groupings. Then perhaps they can arrive at meaningful comparisons.
Your post is gibberish. Subgroups? Demographics and culture? Pure psychobabble. It was a study based on the mental illness called homosexuality and their tendency toward violence. I have a brother that’s “gay”. I used to “gay” bar hop with him and his friends. And they ARE violent. And unstable.
Actually, it’s extremely relevant within the context of social and legal policy debate. And BTW: There were at least 3 comparisons. Don’t forget the heteros. Now, maybe I’m just naive, but that seems like a pretty full comparison. Cherry picking not.
Anyone wiht any sense knows that homosexuals have mental problems and many of these homosexual women are violent.
It is known in the homosexual community that domestic violence is higher than normal couples too.
It is high time for those idiots who say “well I have a homosexual friend and they are nice” need to go to their parades like the folsom fair and see what they really are like when they are with their friends,
My wife had a friend who had a brother who was homosexual in MA, she went to a few of their bars and said it was the sickest thing she has ever seen in her life.
They are all perverts and everything is centered on sex, she also said that all of them are immature and need to grow up.