Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

News Corp. Gives $1 Million to GOP
WSJ ^ | 18 Aug 2010 | By NEIL KING JR. And LOUISE RADNOFSKY

Posted on 08/17/2010 9:57:52 PM PDT by smokingfrog

News Corp., owner of the Fox network, Fox News and newspapers including the New York Post and The Wall Street Journal, gave $1 million in late June to the Republican Governors Association, making it one of the largest corporate donors to the GOP group this election season.

The donation, disclosed in Internal Revenue Service filings, marks a shift for the media giant, which traditionally has given smaller sums to candidates and committees and spread them relatively evenly between the two parties.

News Corp. spokesman Jack Horner said the contribution was intended to promote the company's core beliefs. "News Corporation has always believed in the power of free markets and in organizations like the RGA, which have a pro-business agenda and support our priorities at this most critical time for our economy," he said.

He added, "The corporate donation has no impact on the reporting activities of our newsgathering organizations. There is a strict wall between business and editorial and the corporate office does not consult with our newsgathering organizations ... before making donations."

News Corp. and other network owners are tussling with cable companies over licensing fees cable companies pay to broadcast networks' channels. Amid lobbying in Washington, the fight has in some cases flared up at the state level.

Between 2002 and 2009, News Corp. gave $86,000 to the RGA and the Republican State Leadership Committee, according to IRS records. In the same span, the company gave $60,000 to the Democratic Attorneys General Association.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fox; newscorp
read the comments...
1 posted on 08/17/2010 9:57:54 PM PDT by smokingfrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

At least someone knows to keep it out of Steele’s hands...


2 posted on 08/17/2010 10:01:16 PM PDT by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the existing Constitution"Obama Adviser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Wall Street Journal is owned by News Corp. as well. Interesting that it was WSJ reported it.


3 posted on 08/17/2010 10:07:45 PM PDT by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

I can see how they want to back a winner but this seems stupid for a new group to get involved. Murdock should have done this himself without the company being involved. Now the Repubs will be smeared by taking Saudi money.


4 posted on 08/18/2010 12:05:42 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
News Corp. spokesman Jack Horner said, "The corporate donation has no impact on the reporting activities of our newsgathering organizations. There is a strict wall between business and editorial and the corporate office does not consult with our newsgathering organizations ... before making donations."

LOL, yeah, well, Jack, uh, just drop it. Let's just say we're all glad you didn't give the million to the Rats and leave it at that, okay?

5 posted on 08/18/2010 12:08:08 AM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
He added, "The corporate donation has no impact on the reporting activities of our newsgathering organizations. There is a strict wall between business and editorial and the corporate office does not consult with our newsgathering organizations ... before making donations."

Is this for real? "Strict wall" or not, it looks terrible. Corporations in the news reporting business shouldn't be making donations to any political party. At the very least, I hope Steele & Co. don't go off on another bondage club spree with the money.
6 posted on 08/18/2010 12:23:04 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
Is this for real? "Strict wall" or not, it looks terrible. Corporations in the news reporting business shouldn't be making donations to any political party. At the very least, I hope Steele & Co. don't go off on another bondage club spree with the money.

This is not the RNC which is headed by Steele. It is the Republican Governors Association headed by Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour.

Who gives a damn how it looks? The MSM has been giving free campaign propaganda to the Democrats for years without regret. We are way too sensitive about how things might look, making us patsies to the political correctness ploy. The Left has effectively silenced us by using that tactic. Enough is enough!

7 posted on 08/18/2010 1:36:32 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

“Is this for real? “Strict wall” or not, it looks terrible. Corporations in the news reporting business shouldn’t be making donations to any political party. At the very least, I hope Steele & Co. don’t go off on another bondage club spree with the money. “

Looks like the liberal mindset has infested FR. What a ridiculous thing to write... How many conservatives or independents care at all about this? None. Only liberals like yourself care!


8 posted on 08/18/2010 2:53:18 AM PDT by o2bfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
I'm with you. The other networks are just Pravda for 0bama. Maybe this is some payback by Fox for being shut out of the White House.

WaPo Highlights Dem Outrage at Fox Donations to GOP, Downplays Reality of 50-50 Contributions

9 posted on 08/18/2010 7:00:31 AM PDT by smokingfrog (freerepublic.com - Thanks JimRob! The flags are back! - 8/17/2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Talisker; AnotherUnixGeek; Mind-numbed Robot; o2bfree
News Corp. spokesman Jack Horner said, "The corporate donation has no impact on the reporting activities of our newsgathering organizations. There is a strict wall between business and editorial and the corporate office does not consult with our newsgathering organizations ... before making donations."
That is real important - in a world where pigs aviate.

Freedom of the press does not imply that "the press" is a single entity, nor that that entity is objective. The First Amendment was written and ratified at a time when newspapers were usually openly partisan, and in fact were as much about the perspectives (plural) of of their respective printers than anything else. How could it have been otherwise, when the printers did not have much news which their readers could not learn first from other sources? Most newspapers were weeklies, not dailies.

"The press" became unified under the homogenizing influence of the Associated Press starting in 1848.

"People of the same trade seldom meet together even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public or some contrivance to raise prices." - Adam Smith
The homogeneity and pretensions to objectivity of modern journalism are the result of "a conspiracy against the public." The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.

10 posted on 08/18/2010 7:13:21 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog; conservatism_IS_compassion

I think Murdoch is interested in making money first and the news business second. Some of the drug dealers and foreign influence peddlers who attended coffees in the WH with Slick Willie, for the valuable photo with him for use in expanding their image, for a contribution of $50,000 or more said they knew how politics in America worked, cash money! It is a shame that is true but it seems to be. That is especially true when the Democrats are in office.

Murdoch and other businessmen give to those in positions to affect their lives like the heads of important committees and subcommittees. Of course Pelosi and Reid are the ultimate arbiters of which legislation gets considered.

He also knows that this group of Democrats is about to destroy the largest market of all, the USA and they must be stopped.

The Left, who control the Democrat Party, media, unions, etc., are interested in only one thing - power! To get that power they think, ala Saul Alinsky, that total destruction of America as it is is necessary. They simply want the power and the guns to do their will, even if they aren’t sure what that will is.

To assist that aim they want total destruction of all opposition and opposing voices are chief among those to be destroyed. The Republican Party is next.


11 posted on 08/18/2010 7:56:03 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree
How many conservatives or independents care at all about this? None. Only liberals like yourself care!

What nonsense - stop stating every silly opinion you hold as fact. This is exactly the kind of thing that provides liberals with ammo to deny the real liberal media bias in this country, and independents do listen.
12 posted on 08/18/2010 10:06:08 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

You’re an Obama troll. Get lost!


13 posted on 08/18/2010 9:33:43 PM PDT by o2bfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree
You’re an Obama troll. Get lost!

This is just kind of pitiful.
14 posted on 08/18/2010 10:24:16 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

I saw on another thread you support some of the ideas behind the democrat Net Neutrality bill. That’s what tipped me off that you’re a liberal.


15 posted on 08/22/2010 8:18:43 PM PDT by o2bfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree
I saw on another thread you support some of the ideas behind the democrat Net Neutrality bill. That’s what tipped me off that you’re a liberal.

OK, so you not only don't understand what a liberal is, you also don't know anything about network neutrality. Thanks for keeping me posted.
16 posted on 08/22/2010 8:21:15 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

It’s true, you are for Net Neutrality. And you’re against political free speech for corporations. You are a lib, pure and simple.

Embrace your liberalism, wear it proudly my liberal FRiend!


17 posted on 08/22/2010 8:35:28 PM PDT by o2bfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree
It’s true, you are for Net Neutrality.

Nope - I'm opposed to the capital-N plans put forth by various Democrats, which give far too much discretionary power to unelected bureaucrats at the FCC and will eventually lead to unwarranted government control of the Internet. However, I'm also opposed to ISPs such as Verizon and AT&T destroying the Internet as it currently is through the set-up of preferred connection speeds.

In other words, you're wrong. I don't get the impression that you have any real understanding of this issue, let alone the positions of those who do understand it.

And you’re against political free speech for corporations.

LOL - what? I have no idea what you're babbling about. I strongly oppose McCain-Feingold, which is a blatant violation of 1st Amendment rights.

You are a lib, pure and simple.

I have no idea what "lib" means in your world. You don't appear to know what you're talking about.
18 posted on 08/23/2010 12:54:24 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson