Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: NormsRevenge
Another one bites the dust...
2 posted on
08/04/2010 6:32:39 PM PDT by
Codeflier
(Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama - 4 democrat presidents in a row and counting...)
To: NormsRevenge
Probably? PROBABLY?
What part of “liberals can barely spell ‘science’” does that RINO bimbo not understand?
3 posted on
08/04/2010 6:35:47 PM PDT by
Da Coyote
To: NormsRevenge
4 posted on
08/04/2010 6:36:29 PM PDT by
Plutarch
To: NormsRevenge
A RINO pandering to the left. What is really stupid is that it never pays off at the ballot box anyway. These RINOs sell their meager supply of integrity and the left still hates them.
5 posted on
08/04/2010 6:39:24 PM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there.)
To: NormsRevenge
Jpn and Ken “conservative”? That's putting it nicely.
Hopefully they savaged her the same way they do every other politician who makes a mistake of appearing on their show.
8 posted on
08/04/2010 6:43:05 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(Will must be the harder, courage the bolder, spirit must be the more, as our might lessens.)
To: NormsRevenge
If I still lived in Cali I wouldn’t vote for this idiot.
9 posted on
08/04/2010 6:45:36 PM PDT by
Psycho_Bunny
(Hail To The Fail-In-Chief)
To: NormsRevenge
Whitman, appearing on the conservative John and Ken radio show on KFI in Southern California, said, "In all likelihood I will vote no on Prop. 23In all likelihood I will vote NO on Meg Whitman.
10 posted on
08/04/2010 7:05:42 PM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: NormsRevenge
?
What is up with this woman?
11 posted on
08/04/2010 7:13:08 PM PDT by
calcowgirl
("California just got the best politicians money can buy." -- AuntB, June 9, 2010)
To: NormsRevenge
There is absolutely no reason to vote for her then.
She’s Arnold in a skirt.
15 posted on
08/04/2010 7:42:03 PM PDT by
denydenydeny
(You're not only wrong. You're wrong at the top of your voice. --Spencer Tracy, Bad Day at Black Rock)
To: NormsRevenge
I listened live. John and Ken had her so cornered on the fact that she says one thing in Spanish and something totally different in English. Get out of California while you can!
16 posted on
08/04/2010 7:44:28 PM PDT by
Excellence
("A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it.")
To: NormsRevenge
...your choices this fall: Liberal or Liberaler....
17 posted on
08/04/2010 7:49:23 PM PDT by
Tzimisce
(No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
To: steelyourfaith
To: NormsRevenge
Well, methinks she just lost the energy vote.
You can take that any way you want.
20 posted on
08/04/2010 7:54:05 PM PDT by
cookcounty
("Today's White House reporters seem one ball short of a ping pong scrimmage.")
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Swordmaker; AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; ..
Whitman said Wednesday that she probably will vote against a November ballot initiative that would suspend AB32, California's landmark greenhouse gas reduction law.
This comes as a surprise how??? :') Thanks NormsRevenge.
21 posted on
08/04/2010 8:05:23 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: NormsRevenge
22 posted on
08/04/2010 8:11:46 PM PDT by
ConservativeMind
("Humane" = "Don't pin up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
To: NormsRevenge
She also isn't in favor of using E-Verify because it only has a 90% accuracy rating... 10% false positive or negatives... that means 5% are Citizens falsely come back as Illegal and 5% of Illegals falsely come back as Legal... if you're legal incorrectly classified as illegal you may have to challenge and correct the false report... no biggy... the other 5% is illegals falsely classified as legal... I can live with that too because it means that the remaining 95% of illegals are being correctly classified as illegal... If that percentage isn't good enough for her then nothing ever will be...she's lying when she says she doesn't support illegal immigration.
23 posted on
08/04/2010 8:13:19 PM PDT by
hagendaz
To: NormsRevenge
I'll say it again for those who weren't listening, or who want to contend with me:
Whitman is the WORST POSSIBLE CHOICE FOR GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA!
Conservatives would be better served, by far, by casting their vote for Jerry Brown. Not only would Brown not destroy the State GOP for a generation, he would probably be a better governor too.
And, he's a commie...and will hasten the demise of the dim stranglehold on this state.
24 posted on
08/04/2010 8:15:06 PM PDT by
Mariner
(USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
To: NormsRevenge
She doesn’t make decisions she just parrots what Mitt and Wilson tell her to say!
That bitch wouldn’t know what day it was unless someone told her.
25 posted on
08/04/2010 8:17:24 PM PDT by
dalereed
To: NormsRevenge
Idiocy cloaked with (R) behind its name....=.=
29 posted on
08/04/2010 8:28:12 PM PDT by
cranked
To: NormsRevenge
The national Republicans would be much better off if Whitman loses to Brown. I don’t see any real difference between her and Brown anyway, and the legislature is still going to be run by the tax and spend Rats even if she wins.
It’s obvious Whitman has no principals whatsoever except to get elected and will simply say anything it takes to be elected. And then what? No matter what she does it will be ineffective and she’ll simply be the scapegoat for the Rats when they finish running the state into the ground.
At least if Brown is elected, the Rats will be in total control with no checks or balances, leading to a complete disaster that they will have no ones but themselves to blame.
30 posted on
08/04/2010 8:34:18 PM PDT by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Made from the Right Stuff!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson