I am confused, are they now saying she didn’t say what she said? And that they acted stupidly calling the tea party people racist with no proof?
And so how about the Obama regime, did they act stupidly as well?
Acting with no proof or facts never ends well.
This is gonna be fun. The NAACP can prove her innocent but to do so requires showing that the white house wrongly fired her.
They're saying Breitbart altered the meaning of what she said by editing the clip. Now, it's Breitbart's turn to put up or shut up.
We’re all confused. Some want to give her a free pass because the incident happened 20 years ago but some in the black community don’t want to give free passes for things that happened 150 years ago.
I do feel bad for the lady but she said what she said and did what she did.