Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can state get 'fair share' without earmarks?
The Springfield News Leader ^ | July 12, 2010 | Malia Rulon

Posted on 07/12/2010 8:41:19 PM PDT by Spydergoo

Can state get 'fair share' without earmarks?

Senate candidate Blunt says he'll continue to seek them; Carnahan and Purgason say system flawed.

Washington -- For years, Missouri universities, cities and organizations have received targeted funding from the federal budget, thanks to longtime Sen. Kit Bond, a senior member of the powerful Appropriations Committee.

****** Follow link to News-Leader. Can't post direct link to News-Leader.

(Excerpt) Read more at topics.dallasnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: blunt; carnahan; purgason; senate
I can't believe I'm siding with Carnahan and McCaskill on this...

This is why we need a man with fiscal integrity - Chuck Purgason.

1 posted on 07/12/2010 8:41:21 PM PDT by Spydergoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Spydergoo
“I can't believe I'm siding with Carnahan and McCaskill on this... “

As usual when libs speak they lie by omission. McCaskill has long stated that she favors grants instead of earmarks. Our local community in the past received an “earmark” from Bond's efforts and has received federal grants. There really is very little difference.

Ear Marks are a red herring and a drop in the bucket compared to what the feds dole out. When they vote to use the unspent stimulus to pay down the national debt, and reverse the rest of the spending they just implemented, cut the benefits for federal employees including themselves, then I can applaud that.

In fact, if they would just do that, they could keep their stupid earmarks. All this crap about earmarks is just political postering and a distraction from the biggest financial problems.

2 posted on 07/12/2010 10:28:23 PM PDT by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spydergoo

spending the country into bankruptcy is still spending regardless of the proclaimed local benefit.

Bond and Blunt have both “procured” money for Missouri for various projects. No wonder the federal deficit has ballooned.
What ever happened to people, and communities helping themselves instead of looking to state and federal governments for perks.

A true Conservative Republican like Chuck Purgason will stand against corporate and community welfare. McCaskill and Carnahan are enablers because they don’t say no or stop.

Purgason says NO and STOP. And stands his ground. He is not weak kneed when party hacks threaten him or offer his district perks in exchange for abandoning his principles.
A vote for Chuck on August 3rd will “Chuck Out” the pseudo Republican TARP Bailout party yes man Roy Blunt.


3 posted on 07/13/2010 7:22:00 AM PDT by o_zarkman44 (Conservative Chuck Purgason for US Senate Mo. http://purgasonforsenate.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson