prolife ping
If anything, the abortion clinics are false advertisers because they claim to "help" their clients. Curse on them all!
BTW - what 'alternatives' does Planned Parenthood offer?
They don’t want “choice” they want more abortions. that much is obvious.
Take away the fear, and their entire empire with their profits go away.
There is in all maybe a .5% group of women that get abortions where one can argue that this was necessitated and a mercy-full act. Consider Anencephaly as an example.
However, what has happened, is that the .5% where there is a real argument, possibly even a ethical and merciful case for such intervention is abused by 99.5% for whom this is simply a matter of convenience. Abortion in America is all about convenience, nothing more. The exceptions are used as an argument for what has in reality become the norm.
There are tens of thousands of couples wanting to adopt a baby. Some are willing to pay tens of thousands, accept handicapped kids, children of another race, travel abroad......... You have in most states of the US rules that require any police and fire station as well as hospital to take in a baby “no questions asked.” You have federal, state, and local as well as regious institutions that will support a mother. You have a plethora of health care services at federal, state, county and city level as well as charitable organizations to provide health care essentially for free. So why do we really have these abortions? It's about inconvenience and in some cases it's about hiding the results of ones own behavior.
The problem with the topic of abortion is that it's an all or nothing subject. There is no such thing as a ethical and moral application of this procedure. Even the smallest crack in the door will allow those for abortion to squeeze nearly anyone through because the hedonist does not care and the business side wants to make money. Basically, it always turns into a completely permissive environment even if politically sold to only be used in rare and extreme situations (The incest and rape argument etc) where their is a real need for the mothers health etc. So yes, it needs to be categorically outlawed. If you want an example of a “slippery slope,” abortion would be a great one.
Huh?
>> Vicki Saporta, NAF, charged that most CPCs “do not offer comprehensive reproductive health care options or medically accurate information.”
Consider the most cynical viewpoint to understand what this is about : to profit from the killing of unborn humans.
“Comprehensive reproductive health care” should not include the killing of healthy human life. The phrase usage is not only deceptive, but implies that killing is an acceptable health care option.
These people are sick!
Any abortion mill that advertises or tells its prospective clients that the child within the womb is either not alive, or it is alive but unable to feel (the story changes to fit the client) is outright lying.
Would the law apply to them?