Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Kelloggs Consumer Alert
1 posted on 07/07/2010 8:59:13 AM PDT by EBH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: EBH

China?


2 posted on 07/07/2010 9:01:22 AM PDT by MarineBrat (Better dead than red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EBH

Remember when Corn Pops used to be called Sugar Pops? I love Fruit Loops for evening snack. Anyway, we won’t have to worry about these food recalls for much longer, as I predict that soon the federal government will take over the packaged food industry, and they will take care of everything for us.


3 posted on 07/07/2010 9:01:47 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EBH

Kellogg’s® Apple Jacks®
UPC 3800039136
17 ounce package with Better if Used Before Dates between APR 10 2011 and JUN 22 2011

UPC 3800039132
8.7 ounce packages with Better if Used Before Dates between JUN 03 2011 and JUN 22 2011

Kellogg’s® Corn Pops®
UPC 3800039109
12.5 ounce packages with Better if Used Before Dates between MAR 26 2011 and JUN 22 2011

UPC 3800039111
17.2 ounce packages with Better if Used Before Dates between MAR 26 2011 and JUN 22 2011

UPC 3800039116
9.2 ounce packages with Better if Used Before Dates between APR 05 2011 and JUN 22 2011

Kellogg’s® Froot Loops®
UPC 3800039118
12.2 ounce packages with Better if Used Before Dates between MAR 26 2011 and JUN 22 2011

UPC 3800039120
17 ounce packages with Better if Used Before Dates between MAR 26 2011 and JUN 22 2011

UPC 3800039125
8.7 ounce packages with Better if Used Before Dates between MAR 26 2011 and JUN 22 2011

Kellogg’s® Honey Smacks®
UPC 3800039103
15.3 ounce packages with Better if Used Before Dates between MAR 26 2011 and JUN 22 2011

Again, only products with the letters “KN” following the Better If Used Before Date are included in the recall.


5 posted on 07/07/2010 9:05:24 AM PDT by EBH (Our First Right...."it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EBH

Is this new or did somebody finally call them on it?


6 posted on 07/07/2010 9:05:39 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Who allowed the worst oil pollution disaster in American history and did nothing?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EBH

Fifteen years ago, I appeared as an expert witness in a Kellogg’s lawsuit involving Eggo waffles. The Kellogg’s people had specified inferior sensors in an ammonia refrigeration system. The system failed and several million dollars worth of Eggo waffles were drenched with ammonia. Kellogg’s was suing the sensor maker to recoop losses from opening the boxes and putting the waffles in new containers. Their concern was for the carton not the waffle, which they stated that the cooking would drive off any residual ammonia. Kellogg’s lost the case and had to eat the repackaging costs.
I’ve never used Kellogg’s products since. They don’t care what they sell except that it’s pretty.


9 posted on 07/07/2010 9:20:31 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Comrade O has to go; FIRE THE SHIFTLESS KENYAN NOW !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EBH
are sugary staples of the Kellogg line, marketed with cartoon characters primarily at children

What does that have to do with the recall? Sounds like someone is on a crusade. Apart of the recall, if parents want or don't want their children to eat these cereals, that is up to them.

10 posted on 07/07/2010 9:21:51 AM PDT by Pete (exponential problems require exponential solutions : 29thday.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EBH

11 posted on 07/07/2010 9:23:33 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EBH
From my cold dead hands...


12 posted on 07/07/2010 9:23:51 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EBH

I’ve always made my cereal purchases based on the notion that there was more nutrition in the cereal box than in the contents.


13 posted on 07/07/2010 9:25:17 AM PDT by C210N (0bama, Making the world safe for Marxism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EBH

Thanks for the headsup.


14 posted on 07/07/2010 9:33:39 AM PDT by Rappini ("Pro deo et Patria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EBH

Not meaning to go green, but why do they have two packages for the product - the bag inside the box. There’s no need and the consumer has to pay for the packaging. Eliminate one or the other and lower the price. Plus less packaging equals less to go wrong.


15 posted on 07/07/2010 10:21:23 AM PDT by bgill (how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EBH

Praise be to God that Cocoa Puffs are from General Mills.


16 posted on 07/07/2010 10:25:09 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson