Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USS Nimitz successfully completes sea trials
Brahmand.com ^ | 7/6/2010 | Brahmand.com

Posted on 07/05/2010 10:11:01 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

): USS Nimitz (CVN 68) has successfully completed its sea trials at the western Pacific Ocean.

For the first time in three months Nimitz was departed from the Naval Base Coronado on June 29 and the sea trials were completed by July 2.

The trials were mainly done to test and evaluate Nimitz' main engines along with other equipment (elevators, doors, catapults and high-speed power turns) after conducting a 30-day Carrier Incremental Availability.

"For us, the main concern was shaking off the dust after a three month layoff making sure we had the same skill sets in place," Master Chief Quartermaster (SW/AW) Robert Barber, leading chief petty officer of Navigation, said in a US Navy news release.

USS Nimitz’ main engines and the aqueous foam forming film (AFFF) system on the flight deck and the hangar bay were also checked by the sailors. The objective of the trial was to ensure that all the AFFF sprinklers were working and covering their assigned areas.

(Excerpt) Read more at brahmand.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aircraftcarrier; cvn; cvn68; dfens; nasnorthisland; navair; sandiego; usn; usnavy; ussnimitz

1 posted on 07/05/2010 10:11:10 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; Mr. Mojo; James C. Bennett; mowowie; Captain Beyond; darkwing104; JRios1968; ...

Ping


2 posted on 07/05/2010 10:13:57 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Good. Thanks sonofstrangelove.


3 posted on 07/05/2010 10:19:52 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


4 posted on 07/05/2010 10:26:10 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
USS Reagan & Nimitz 2 of the 3 Nuclear Carriers based in San Diego
5 posted on 07/05/2010 10:26:19 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
Sea Trials just before deployment.

She'll be underway on a WestPac within two weeks.

She could be in a supporting role in the IO within 6 weeks.

If Naval deployments matter, and if the US KNOWS when Israel will strike, this portends a strike around the middle or end of August.

6 posted on 07/05/2010 10:26:51 PM PDT by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

Looks like Enterprise...


7 posted on 07/05/2010 10:43:15 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Freedom's Fortress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

................... this portends a strike around the middle or end of August.......................

Except for the fact that we have a weak muslim traitor at our helm. He’ll be hiding out at the clubhouse.

Isreal will have to go it alone, but maybe our navy can standby offshore, and take the edge off some of the counter-attack


8 posted on 07/05/2010 10:46:35 PM PDT by Noob1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
"aqueous foam forming film (AFFF)"
It's been 15 years, but I believe "A triple F" is "aqueous FILM forming FOAM"...
9 posted on 07/05/2010 11:21:23 PM PDT by astyanax (Liberalism: Logic's retarded cousin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

ping


10 posted on 07/05/2010 11:22:40 PM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad

I don’t see a ‘65’ on the fwd flight deck.


11 posted on 07/06/2010 12:30:04 AM PDT by rahbert (Our enemy has yet to reveal himself...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

I remember back in 1975 when the brand new Nimitz tied up opposite my ship,the USS Independence,to Pier 13 (or 14? memory has faded some) in Norfolk Va. Didn’t get to tour her though,we had to leave for our Med cruise.

I felt so sorry for her crew,all pop tall spit and polish until the next show boat is commissioned.
Then they could relax and be regular slobs like the rest of us.


12 posted on 07/06/2010 3:04:53 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Liberals frolic at ersatz enlightenment because conservatives keep the savages from the door.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; investigateworld; lowbuck; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

13 posted on 07/06/2010 3:13:24 AM PDT by magslinger (If recycling makes cents as well as sense, I am all for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

To see a Nimitz class carrier in a high speed power turn must be quite a sight.


14 posted on 07/06/2010 3:41:01 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

The other one is definitely Enterprise. Notice the big square island structure? That’s the “Big E.” The island was built that way for a “billboard” phased-array radar system that was originally installed on “E” and crusier Long Beach. It was shortly replaced by conventional radars but the square island remained. I know my carriers, served on CVN-68, CVN-69, and CV-67; and I work on all the ships here in Norfolk.


15 posted on 07/06/2010 4:03:25 AM PDT by fredhead (Liberals think globally, reason rectally, act idiotically.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rahbert
Yep, definitely Big E. I'm looking at her right now across the Roads from me.
16 posted on 07/06/2010 4:32:38 AM PDT by Jonah Hex ("Never underestimate the hungover side of the Force.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

With the planes situated on deck as they are, and a serious threat took place, how long would it take the planes to get airborne?


17 posted on 07/06/2010 5:05:53 AM PDT by Rannug ("When you make peaceful protest impossible, you make violent protest inevitable." JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rannug

Depending on where they are, I believe a carrier battle group (almost) always has some aircraft on patrol. Then they may have another flight on “alert 5” which means they can be airborne in 5 minutes or less. Similarly, there may be more aircraft and crews on alert 15 and 30 status. But exactly how ready for trouble they really are comes down to where they are, and what kind of trouble they expect. Besides, these are instruments to project power - generally they spell trouble for someone else. ;-)


18 posted on 07/06/2010 5:33:38 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (obama out now! I'll keep my money, my guns, and my freedom - you can keep the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: neodad

The one on the right does. Must be an old picture; the Enterprise has been based on the east coast for years now.


19 posted on 07/06/2010 5:38:12 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Abraham Lincoln: For when it happened too long ago to blame on George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson