Two things strike me, 45 member council to run a city that size is silly and the that these people so disrespect the Constitution and the laws of the country.
1 posted on
07/02/2010 9:59:25 AM PDT by
edcoil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: edcoil
It’s the Chicago Daley Mob
2 posted on
07/02/2010 10:00:50 AM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
To: edcoil
Ignore the Chicago law and do what you need to do to defend yourself and your family. My rights don’t come from government, they come from God.
To: edcoil
Hopefully the people of Chicago will treat the edict from the council with the same respect the council showed the SCOTUS.
there's absolutely no reason to pay any attention to their order.
4 posted on
07/02/2010 10:02:08 AM PDT by
skeeter
To: edcoil
There ought to be jail time for any public official who enforces a law that has been struck down by the Supreme court.
To: edcoil
Just out of curiosity: how many Republicans members are there among the 45?
6 posted on
07/02/2010 10:03:04 AM PDT by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: edcoil
I would love to see a bench warrant from the Supremes to arrest the 45 idiots for contempt, and have them jailed by Federal Marshals.
To: edcoil
It appears that being killed in Chicago is preferable to you being able to defend yourself.
The world is truly upside down.
8 posted on
07/02/2010 10:04:34 AM PDT by
jakota
(®)
To: edcoil
What a state should do, is outlaw abortion. Just forget about Roe v Wade. Ignore the Supreme Court. There is no penumbra to the Constitution. Abortion is now illegal in our state.
This is what Chicago is going with guns. Will the media howl?? No. If a state really did this with abortion, would the media howl? You betcha.
To: edcoil
I guess the city council doesn’t bother with the national news, huh.
12 posted on
07/02/2010 10:11:47 AM PDT by
Desdemona
(One Havanese is never enough.)
To: edcoil
Hey Mister Mare, say hi to Alan Gura for me willya?
To: edcoil
Hmm, .45 is an interesting number!
14 posted on
07/02/2010 10:17:29 AM PDT by
saganite
(What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
To: edcoil
This is a very shrewed move as these foul politicians are well aware that the court will be moving leftward and there is a good chance the court will reverse its recent gun ruling.
15 posted on
07/02/2010 10:24:19 AM PDT by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: edcoil
16 posted on
07/02/2010 10:24:36 AM PDT by
an amused spectator
(Watching the MSM with Obama is like watching Joslyn James with Tiger Woods)
To: edcoil
Screw the good mob mayor, the first false arrest law suite against a cop that arrests you will pay you millions.
To: edcoil
To: edcoil
Chicago is the city that allows terrorist killers to be free and to serve on their universities and as members of the education board that teaches their children to be anti-American. Is it not disgusting that a sorry idiot place like Chicago which is totally anti-American would put in place laws that are in direct violation of the Constitution? Sounds like they are the children of Hitler and Stalin and their city free terrorist are truly Nazi scum.
19 posted on
07/02/2010 10:30:02 AM PDT by
YOUGOTIT
(The Royal 100 Club is Acting the Same as the Roman Senate When the Republic Collapsed)
To: edcoil
Chicago wants you to pay a fee to exercise a constitutional right.
To: edcoil
Why do these DEMOCRATS sound and act just like the DEMOCRATS who stood in the doors of the school buildings and challenged the Federal Agents who brought the black kids to school? I doubt the idiot in the white house would see the irony.
26 posted on
07/02/2010 10:35:51 AM PDT by
Steamburg
(The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
To: edcoil
Chicago approves tough new handgun restrictions That's a rather misleading title. Chicago is actually relaxing its restrictions from an outright handgun ban to an onerous system of licensing.
But my guess is that the gungrabbers at the AP had to frame the title at least as some sort of gungrabber victory rather than the actual defeat that this retrenchment represents.
27 posted on
07/02/2010 10:37:20 AM PDT by
snowsislander
(In this election year, please ask your candidates if they support repeal of the 1968 GCA.)
To: edcoil
I also noticed that the council has 45 members - that’s four or five times as many as most city councils, and it suggests an extremely bloated government. And the 45-0 vote suggests an extremely monolithic and un-diverse council.
28 posted on
07/02/2010 10:37:37 AM PDT by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson